Numéro
OCL
Volume 29, 2022
Organic foods in the oil & protein crop supply chain / Le « Bio » dans la filière oléoprotéagineuse
Numéro d'article 21
Nombre de pages 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2022015
Publié en ligne 13 juin 2022
  • Aipova R, Abdykadyrova AB, Kurmanbayev AA 2019. Biological products in organic agriculture. Plant Biotechnol Breed 2(4): 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Akhshanov TS. 2019. Terms, methods and norms of safflower seeding on a uncovered bogharic land. J Agric Sci Kazakhstan 10: 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Arslan Y, Bayraktar N 2016. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on the oil content and composition of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) under Ankara ecological conditions. J Tekirdag Agric Fac 13(03): 65–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Asmarian S, Nowrozani RF, Mohaghegh DM. 2017. Comparison of histopathological effects of milk thistle, and chicory plants and vitamin E in all rats treated with gentamicin using Optical Microscopy Method. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci 6(1): 251–259. [Google Scholar]
  • Azimzadeh SM. 2017. Effect of organic fertilizers on yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Iran J Field Crops Res 15(3) – Serial Number 47: 575–587. https://doi.org/10.22067/gsc.v15i3.49077. [Google Scholar]
  • Development of Organic Agriculture in Kazakhstan. 2018. Coalition for “green” economy and development “G-Global”: [website]. Kazakhstan. https://greenkaz.org/index.php/press-centr/novosti-v-strane/item/1987-razvitie-organicheskogo-selskogo-khozyajstva-v-kazakhstane. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubey J, Singh A. 2019. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using extracts of pomegranate peels for pharmaceutical application. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res 9(1): 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Flemmer AC, Franchini MC, Lindström LI. 2015. Description of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) phenological growth stages according to the extended BBCH scale. Ann Appl Biol 166(2): 331–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gabdulov MA, Vyurkov VV, Archipkin VG, et al. 2018. Methods of field and laboratory research. Uralsk: WKATU Zhangir Khan: 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Günç P, Zeynep E, Özbek A. 2020. Cold pressed safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seed oil. Cold Pressed Oils 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2018-0-03151-5. [Google Scholar]
  • Hussain MI, Lyra D, Farooq M, Nikoloudakis N, Khalid N. 2016. Salt and drought stresses in safflower: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36: 4–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Igolnikova LV. 2018. Application of growth regulators on safflower crops in OOO “Kamyshinskoye farm”. Fermer. Povolzhie 2(66): 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanov VM, Tolmachev VV. 2018. Influence of elements of sowing technology on productivity of safflower in Volgograd Zavolzhye. Prospects for the development of arid territories through integration of science and practice. Moscow. Agron Sustain Develop 36(4): 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0344-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanchenko T, Belikina A. 2021. Protection elements for safflower oilseeds. KnE Life Sciences. DonAgro: International Research Conference on Challenges and Advances in Farming, Food Manufacturing, Agricultural Research and Education, pp. 191–197. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v0i0.8947. [Google Scholar]
  • Iztaev A, Baibatyrov T, Mukasheva T, Muldavekova B, Yakyiyayeva M. 2020. Experimental studies of the Baisheshek barley grain processed by the ion-ozone mixture. Periodico Tche Quimica 35(17): 239–258. [Google Scholar]
  • Joshi S, Thoday-Kennedy E, Daetwyler HD, Hayden M, Spangenberg G, Kant S. 2021. High-throughput phenotyping to dissect genotypic differences in safflower for drought tolerance. PLoS ONE 16: e0254908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254908. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khalid N, Khan RS, Hussain MI, Farooq M, Ahmad A, Ahmed I. 2017. A comprehensive characterisation ofsafflower oil for its potential applications as a bioactive food ingredient. Trends Food Sci Technol 66: 176–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar UK, Vani KP, Srinivas A, Surendra BP. 2017. Yield, nutrient uptake and economics of safflower as influenced by INM under irrigation and rainfed planting. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci (IJCMAS) 6(10): 2178–2183. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumari VV, Roy A, Vijayan R, et al. 2021. Drought and heat stress in cool-season food legumes in sub tropical regions: Consequences, adaptation, and mitigation strategies. Plants 10: 1038. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Louaer M, Zermane A, Larkeche O, Meniai AH. 2018. Supercritical CO2 extraction of Algerian date seeds oil: effect of experimental parameters on extraction yield and fatty acids composition. World J Environ Biosci 7(2): 108–116. [Google Scholar]
  • Malusà E, Pinzari F, Canfora L. 2016. Efficacy of biofertilizers: Challenges to improve crop production. In: Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. New Delhi: Springer, pp. 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2644-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Nasiyev BN. 2013. The role of organic fertilizers in increasing the fertility of West Kazakhstan soils. Polish J Soil Sci 46(2): 115–146. [Google Scholar]
  • Nasiyev BN, Yeleshev R. 2014. Modern state of the soils of flood irrigation systems in the semidesert zone. Eurasian Soil Sci 47(6): 613–620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nasiyev BN, Tulegenova D, Zhanatalapov N, Bekkaliev A, Shamsutdinov Z. 2015. Studying the impact of grazing on the current state of Grassland in the Semi-desert Zone. Biosci Biotechnol Res Asia 12(2): 1735–1742. [Google Scholar]
  • Nasiyev BN, Zhanatalapov NZH, Shibaikin B, Yancheva HG. 2020a. Adaptation of elements of Sudan grass cultivation to the conditions of dry-steppe zone. Turkish J Field Crops 25(1): 57–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nasiyev BN, Bekkaliyev AK, Zhanatalapov NZH, Shibaikin B, Yeleshev R. 2020b. Changes in the physicochemical parameters of chestnut soils in Western Kazakhstan under the influence of the grazing technologies. Periodico Tche Quimica 35(17): 192–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Nasiyev B., Zhanatalapov NZH, Shibaikin B. 2021. Assessment of the elements of the sudan grass cultivation technology in the zone of dry steppes. OnLine J Biol Sci 21(1): 172–180. https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2021.172.180. [Google Scholar]
  • Norov MS. 2014. Safflower is a promising oilseed culture. Dushanbe, pp. 44–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Nurmukhametov NM. 2020. Biological ways to improve soil fertility. Ufa, pp. 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Osipova I. 2016. Allelopathic properties of European cranberry mush (Viburnum opulus L.) – valuable decorative, medicinal and fruit plant. Int C Hortic 6: 146–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Özer I, Bağcι A. 2014. Effects of organic fertilizer on yield and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Agric Forest 60(4): 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Postnikov DA. 2017. Method of purification of soils from heavy metals. RU2365078C1. Patent for invention. [Google Scholar]
  • Razumnova LA, Kamenev RA, Turchin VV. 2018. Effect of mineral fertilizers and bacterial preparations on the productivity and oil content of safflower in the North-Eastern area of the Rostov region. Bull Voronezh State Agrarian Univ 1(56): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2071-2243.2018.1.43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Razumnova LA, Kamenev RA, Mukhortova VK. 2019. Effect of mineral fertilizers and bacterial preparations on safflower productivity and oil content in the Rostov region. Agrarian Sci 1: 50–52. https://doi.org/10.32634/0869-8155-2019-321-1-50-52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roche J, Mouloungui Z, Cerny M, Merah O. 2019. Effect of sowing dates on fatty acids and phytosterols patterns of Carthamus tinctorius L. Appl Sci 9(14): 2839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9142839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Salvatore LB, Teresa T, Luca L, Roberto M, Claudio L, Mario L. 2019. An agronomic evaluation of new safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) germplasm for seed and oil yields under Mediterranean climate conditions. Agronomy 9(8): 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9080468. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanjay S. 2017. Effect of soil biological properties on crop production. Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi, pp. 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanjay S. 2020. Soil microbes for securing the future of sustainable farming. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 9(4): 2687–2706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sayilir C, Cinar V.M, Unay A 2019. Determination of yield and yield components in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under Menemen-Izmir ecological conditions. ANADOLU J Aegean Agric Res Inst 29(1): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.18615/anadolu.568851. [Google Scholar]
  • Tolmachev VV. 2017. Productivity of safflower at different terms, norms and methods of sowing in the conditions of Volgograd Zavolzhye. Volgograd, pp. 37–39. [Google Scholar]
  • The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan. On production of organic products: dated November 27, 2015 No. 423-V ZRK. URL: https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=37002307#pos=164;-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Ummahan Ö.Z 2017. The effects of different cultivation and ecological conditions on yield and quality of Carthamus tinctorius l. (Safflower). Conference: I. International Congress on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: “Natural and Life Science”, Konya, May 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327221093. [Google Scholar]
  • Usmanov A Is a valuable oilseed crop. 2011. Bull Agric Sci Kazakhstan 10: 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Vinicius M, Sarto M, Bassegio Ciro D, Rosolem A, Rocha J, Sarto W 2018. Safflower root and shoot growth affected by soil compaction. Soil and plant nutrition. Bragantia 77(2): 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017191 [Google Scholar]
  • Zemour K, Adda A, Labdelli A, Dellal A, Cerny M, Merah O. 2021. Effects of genotype and climatic conditions on the oil content and its fatty acids composition of Carthamus tinctorius L. seeds. Agronomy 11:2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zvyagintsev DG. 2016. Biological activity of soils and scales for evaluation of some of its indicators. Soil Sci 6: 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Willer H, Travnicek J, Schlatter B. 2020. Current status of organic oilseeds worldwide. Statistical update. OCL 27(62): 6. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2020048. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.