Open Access
Numéro
OCL
Volume 29, 2022
Numéro d'article 7
Nombre de pages 8
Section Quality - Food safety
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2021052
Publié en ligne 20 janvier 2022

© A. Chemat et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2022

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Crude oil is the world’s largest traded commodity, gratifying the ever-growing demand for our energy and fuel needs. And it is no surprise that coffee, also fondly referred to as “human fuel” ranks among the top ten traded food commodities globally (Murthy and Naidu, 2012; Santos et al., 2021). Europe, the largest coffee market in the world accounts for one-third of the global coffee consumption (2019). The per capita coffee consumption in the European Union (2018) was reported be 5.15 kg (green coffee equivalent). And within Europe, France is the second-largest coffee consumer making up 12% of the European consumption in the year 2018 (European Coffee Report, 2018/2019). Spent coffee grounds (SCG) are the insoluble residues generated after milling and brewing of coffee beans, and they contain significant amounts of organic compounds namely fatty acids, amino acids, polyphenols, polysaccharides and minerals (Campos-Vega et al., 2015). The chemical composition (Aguilar-Raymundo et al., 2019) of spent coffee grounds is shown in Figure 1.

Under the current waste management system SCG are predominantly incinerated, dumped in landfills or categorically sorted with the organic fraction of the municipal solid wastes and recycled via anaerobic digestion or composting (Cameron and O’Malley, 2016; Battista et al., 2020). Voluminous disposal of SCG directly in landfills without any prior pre-treatments could exacerbate global warming due to the increased emission of methane, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases (Atabani et al., 2019).

Extraction is one of the vital tools that is used to retrieve compounds of commercial interest from complex biomasses (Chemat et al., 2021). Using green extraction principles as an alternative to conventional methods is an added advantage that helps in realizing the true potential offered by a variety of plant materials. Indeed, the sustainability aspect of developing eco-friendly processes in both laboratory-scale and industrial-scale is a critical indicator that determines the success rate of such methods (Chemat et al., 2019). Edible oil is ubiquitous and widely used in food, feed, cosmetic and pharmaceutical applications. Typical edible oil extraction relies heavily on hexane as solvent, which is of petroleum origin; is also a known pollutant and neurotoxin (Rapinel et al., 2020). Recently, screening bio-based solvents as a potential alternative to replace hexane has been the scope of several research works. Within this domain, the solvent 2-methyloxolane, commonly known as 2-methyltetrahydrofuran was examined extensively for its usability for defatting of commercial oilseeds namely soybean and rapeseed as well as alternative lipid sources such as insects (Sicaire et al., 2015; Ravi et al., 2019; Rapinel et al., 2020; Claux et al., 2021).

Although studies on alternative techniques and bio-based solvents for lipid extraction from spent coffee grounds have been examined earlier, this study focuses on the feasibility of using dry 2-methyloxolane and aqueous 2-methyloxolane (95.5%) which is a saturated solution of water in 2-MeOx as alternatives to hexane for defatting SCG. Recycling of dry 2-MeOx is a crucial step in the industrial utilization of the solvent for oil extraction. During the recycling stage, after condensation and decantation, the resulting solvent mixture separates into an organic phase saturated with 4.5% water at 55 °C and an aqueous phase containing 2-MeOx (7%) at 55 °C. The rationale behind studying the applicability of aqueous 2-MeOx is to see whether we can bypass another drying stage (distillation) to obtain dry 2-MeOx and use aqueous 2-MeOx directly for defatting purposes (Rapinel et al., 2020; Claux et al., 2021). The overall lipid profile such as yield, fatty acid profile and lipid class composition of the solvent extracted crude SCG oils were compared. The residual caffeine content in the defatted SCG biomass was estimated.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Chemical composition of spent coffee grounds.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Raw material, standards and reagents

Fresh spent coffee grounds were retrieved from the local cafeteria (CROUS, Agroparc, Avignon) and immediately air-dried at 40 °C for 48 h to remove excess moisture content and stored in a dry place at ambient temperature. All solvents were of analytical grade and purchased from VWR international (Darmstadt, Germany). The solvent 2-methyloxolane A.K.A. 2-methyltetrahydrofuran was sourced from Honeywell, Sigma-Aldrich Co, St. Louis (MO, USA). The standards used for chromatography analyses were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).

2.2 Lipid extraction

The dried SCG was milled in a microfine grinder (IKA, MF 10 basic, Germany) equipped with an interchangeable sieve (hole size: Ø 1.0 mm) in order to obtain a homogenous powder. Lipid extraction with different solvents was carried out immediately after the size reduction step. A conventional soxhlet system was used to extract the lipids from the initial raw material. Two solvents hexane and 2-methyloxolane (2-MeOx) were employed for defatting the matrix. The solvent 2-MeOx was taken in its dry form and water-saturated aqueous form (2-MeOx 95.5%). Therefore, in total three solvent systems hexane, 2-MeOx (dry), and 2-MeOx 95.5% were evaluated. The solid to the solvent ratio for the extraction system was 1:10 (w/v) and the extraction was carried out for 6 h. The solvent was removed from the miscella under reduced pressure using a rotavapor (R-300, Buchi, Switzerland). The crude lipid extracts were transferred to an amber vial, flushed with nitrogen and stored at −18 °C until further analyses.

2.3 Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) by acid-catalyzed transmethylation

Acid-catalyzed transmethylation was performed by adding 1 mL of methanolic sulfuric acid (5%) to a known quantity of the SCG lipids. The samples were spiked with internal standard triheptadecanoin (C17:0; TAG), and the mixture was heated for 90 min at 85 °C. Post transmethylation, the mixture was brought to room temperature to which 1.5 mL of sodium chloride (0.9%, w/v) and 1 mL of hexane (GC-FID grade) were added to initiate phase separation. The mixture was vortexed for 30 s, and the organic layer was recovered and analyzed for the fatty acid profile. An Agilent (Kyoto, Japan) gas chromatography system coupled with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) was used for the identification and relative quantitation of the fatty acid profiles. The instrument was equipped with a BD-EN14103 capillary column 30 m × 320 μm × 0.25 μm (Agilent). Helium was the carrier gas, and its velocity was set at 33 cm/s. The injection volume of the samples was 2 μL in a split mode (split ratio 1:20), and the back detector temperature was set at 260 °C. The oven temperature profile was set at 50 °C for 1 min and then increased gradually at a rate of 20 °C/min from 50 °C to 180 °C and increased from 180 °C to 220 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min. Finally, the temperature was maintained at 230 °C for 10 min before the end of each run. FAME was identified by comparing the retention time with purified FAME standard (Supelco, 37 FAME mix), and the relative quantity was estimated based on the internal standard (Breil et al., 2016; Ravi et al., 2019; Gharby et al., 2020).

2.4 High-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC)

All samples (1 mg/mL) and standards (0.2 mg/mL) were prepared in chloroform and stored in the dark at −20 °C. A mixture of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) was used to pre-develop HPTLC plates (silica gel 60 F254). This step was followed by drying the plates at 110 °C for 60 min on a TLC plate heater (CAMAG, Switzerland).

Lipid extracts of known quantity were spotted on 20 × 10 cm silica gel plates with an ATS 5 automatic TLC sampler. This step was followed by the development of the plates with a mixture of solvent acting as a mobile phase for elution in an ADC 2 automatic development chamber (CAMAG). For neutral lipids quantitation the mobile phase comprised n-hexane/diethyl ether/glacial acetic acid in a ratio of 70:30:2; v/v/v. The elution height was 7 cm from the origin (spot position). Finally, the plate was dipped in a revelation reagent (10 mg primuline, 160 mL acetone, 40 mL dH2O), which was then visualized, derivatized, and scanned using a TLC scanner 3 (Breil et al., 2016; Ravi et al., 2019; Gharby et al., 2020) equipped with WinCATs software (CAMAG).

2.5 High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV analysis

The caffeine content in the solvent defatted SCG powders was analyzed by HPLC equipped with a UV detector (Agilent 1220 Infinity LC). Alkaloid extraction from the SCGs was realized by a simple solid-liquid extraction at 95 °C for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered using a PTFE filter (pore size: 0.20 μm) and taken in amber HPLC vials and placed in the autosampler module. The chromatographic separation was executed in a reverse-phase column (micro Bondapack C18) using an isocratic elution mixture of acidified (1% acetic acid) water (79%) and methanol (20%). The sample injection volume was 10 μL, and the volumetric flow rate of the mobile phase was fixed at 1 mL/min. Detection was carried out with a UV photometer at a wavelength of 280 nm. Various concentration of caffeine standard (3–22.5 ppm) was prepared for generating the calibration curve.

2.6 Theoretical solubility prediction of caffeine

A conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) was used to theoretically calculate the thermodynamic properties of solvation without any experimental data. The solute is treated as if embedded in a dielectric medium via a molecular surface constructed around the molecule. This is a macroscopic approach using a dielectric constant of the solvent. Parameters such as σ-surface, σ-profile and σ-potential (Figs. 2a2c) aid in estimating the solubility of the solute in the solvent system. In this case, the theoretical solubility of caffeine in the solvent systems was determined. The data was calculated in COSMOthermX’20 program (BIOVIA, Dassault systems). The standard quantum chemical method triple-valence polarized basis set (TZVP) was employed in this study and the results are expressed as log10(x_solub). More data on the solubility prediction of polar and non-polar compounds in various solvent systems can be found in relevant previous studies (Sicaire et al., 2015; Breil et al., 2016; Claux et al., 2021).

thumbnail Fig. 2

(a) Lipid class composition; (b) HPTLC plate; (c) Overlay of chromatograms; (d–f) Individual chromatogram with substance assignment. TAG: Triacylglycerides; FFA: Free fatty acids; DAG: Diacylglycerides.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Effect of solvent on lipid yield

The global lipid yield from SCGs was highest in the case of aqueous 2-MeOx (15.84%), which could be attributed to the solvent’s higher polarity when compared to dry 2-MeOx and hexane. Several research articles have previously reported a similar trend where dry 2-MeOx extracted more lipids from a wide array of matrices than the petroleum-based hexane solvent. As the polarity of water-saturated (aqueous 2-MeOx 95.5%) is higher than its dry counterpart, it is plausible that some polyphenols, sterols, and other unsaponifiable components were solubilized in the solvent system thereby augmenting the crude lipid yield. The increase in the lipid fraction yield in the case of aqueous 2-MeOx could also be attributed to better solubilization of polar lipids such as phospholipids in the solvent system.

The lipid extractability of the solvents hexane, dry and aqueous 2-MeOx from various biomaterials is summarized in Table 1. The data highlights the higher efficiency of the solvent 2-MeOx in terms of lipid extraction and can be considered a potential replacement for hexane. In case of oilseeds, particularly soybean, it was reported that dry 2-MeOx was able to extract 4.7% more lipophilic constituents than hexane and the 2-MeOx extracted crude soybean oil displayed superior antioxidant activity and oxidative stability. More data on the solvents origin, synthesis, characteristics, properties, efficacy and toxicity were comprehensively reviewed and detailed in a recent study.

Somnuk et al. (2017) compared four solvents namely hexane, anhydrous ethanol, hydrous ethanol, and methanol for their coffee oil extractability potential from SCG. The extractions (maceration) were carried out at room temperature (30 °C) and reported the following coffee oil yields for the solvents studied 14.7% (hexane), 13.1% (anhydrous ethanol), 11.8% (aqueous ethanol) and 7.5% (methanol) respectively. Another study (Al-Hamamre et al., 2012) comparing the coffee oil extractability of non-polar solvents such as pentane, hexane, toluene, chloroform and polar solvents such as acetone, isopropanol and ethanol reported oil yield within the range of 8.6% to 15.28%. Novel green alternatives to conventional extraction methods like accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and supercritical carbon dioxide extractions (SCE) were investigated for oil recovery from SCGs (Muangrat and Pongsirikul, 2019). The yield obtained with different extraction techniques were as follows: ASE (solvent: propanol) – 14.02%, SCE (CO2) – 12.11% and conventional Soxhlet (solvent: propanol) – 13.75% (Muangrat and Pongsirikul, 2019). Overall, defatting or delipification of SCGs can be executed with green extraction techniques and in case of conventional extraction systems bio-based solvent such as 2-MeOx proves to be a viable alternative exhibiting superior properties. Coffee oil extracted from SCGs possess numerous applications including biodiesel, feed ingredient, fuel in the form of pellets and also can be exploited for their antioxidant potential and inclusion in green composites (Peshev et al., 2018; Leow et al., 2021).

Table 1

Crude lipid yield of SCG and other biomaterials.

3.2 Fatty acid profile of SCG lipids

Fatty acid methyl esters of crude SCG oils were investigated (GC-FID) and the results are summarized in Table 2. The predominant fatty acids were palmitic (C16) and linoleic acid (C18:2) constituting almost 80% of the lipid fraction. The overall fatty acid profile of SCG oils extracted with hexane, dry and aqueous 2-MeOx solvents was similar. A marginal increase in relative percentage of a few fatty acids (oleic, linoleic and linolenic) was witnessed in oil extracted with dry 2-MeOx compared to hexane. The relative proportion of fatty acids in all SCG oils are indicated in decreasing order: PUFA > SFA > MUFA. Loyao et al. (2018) examined the potential of renewable non-polar solvents (ethyl acetate, ethanol, n-propanol and isopropanol) for lipid extraction from SCG and concluded that ethyl acetate and n-propanol enabled complete recovery of available lipids from SCG. They also found that both solvents (ethyl acetate and n-propanol) were able to extract simultaneously around 93% and 87% of the available tocopherol in SCG. Interestingly, solvent 2-MeOx exhibited higher tocopherol recovery in crude oils extracted from soybean when compared to that of hexane (Claux et al., 2021). Theoretical solubility prediction results of select sterols and compounds of interest belonging to the lipid fraction in solvent system comprised of hexane and 2-MeOx have always favored the latter and is being increasingly proven with experimental results as well (Sicaire et al., 2015; Breil et al., 2016; Ravi et al., 2019).

Vardon et al. (2013) analyzed the coffee oil obtained from SCG with hexane solvent through Soxhlet extraction and reported a similar fatty acid profile. Linoleic acid was the principal fatty acid with 45% followed by palmitic acid with 33.9% (Karmee, 2018). Comparable results were obtained by Somnuk et al. (2017) for coffee oil extracted with hexane. Whereas the fatty acid profile of SCG lipid extracted with supercritical CO2 varied based on the extraction parameters such as temperature (40–60 °C) and pressure (175–200 bar).

Muangrat and Pongsirikul (2019) noted significant differences in the concentrations of major fatty acids namely palmitic (32.98–41.83 g/100 g) and linoleic acid (34.99–42.25 g/100 g).

Table 2

Fatty acid profile solvent extracted SCG oils.

3.3 Lipid class composition

Lipid class composition analysis of solvent extracted coffee oil from SCGs revealed that triacylglycerides (relative weight of the oil fraction) were the principal lipid constituent accounting for 93.69% in the aqueous 2-MeOx extract, 94.97% in dry 2-MeOx, and 95.52% in the hexane extract respectively. As shown in Figure 2a, the relative percentage of free fatty acids was higher in dry (4.99%) and aqueous 2-MeOx (6.26%) extracted oils when compared to hexane (4.45%) extracted SCG oil. This increase could be due to better extractability displayed by 2-MeOx solvent or potential hydrolysis occurring during lipid extraction as 2-MeOx is prone to absorb moisture from the biomaterial (Claux et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the 4.45% of fatty acids present in the lipid fraction could have originated during the intended use of coffee powder or perhaps while drying the material before oil extraction. These results are in line with earlier findings where lipid extraction with 2-MeOx in dry and aqueous mode lead to hydrolysis of TAG into FFA, DAG, MAG (Ravi et al., 2019; Gharby et al., 2020; Smets et al., 2021). This phenomenon can be attributed to the water affinity displayed by 2-MeOx. The extraction temperature and time also plays a significant role in triglyceride hydrolysis. Apart from hydrolysis, another plausible hypothesis that could explain the higher content of FFA in the aqueous 2-MeOx fraction is better extraction of FFA that are bound to other compounds in the SCG matrix which largely remain insoluble in apolar solvents. More data on the hydrolysis kinetics and conditions triggering the solvent-mediated lipolysis could aid in establishing preventive measures to circumvent the problem.

Previously reported data in the literature indicates that triglycerides and fatty acids are the predominant lipid class found in SCG oils. For instance, Efthymiopoulos et al. (2019a) reported TAG concentrations ranging between 39% and 74% whereas fatty acids ranged from 11% to 33%. Meanwhile, diglycerides and monoglycerides were also found in SCG oils but the latter was found in higher amounts (8–23%) than the monoglycerides (0–6%). Similarly, lipid profile analysis of SCG oil extracted utilizing ASE technique with hexane at varying temperatures (125–185 °C) showed that TAGs made up 45% to 64% and FFAs accounted for 27 to 35% of the lipid class (Efthymiopoulos et al., 2019b). Somnuk et al. (2017) characterized hexane extracted coffee oil and found 81.2% of TAG, 5.93% DAG, 11.43% MAG and 0.41% FFA, respectively, in the lipid fraction. High FFA content in the coffee oil might pose serious problems in their downstream applications. For preparation of biofuels, high FFA content in the lipid fraction requires pre-treatments such as acid-catalyzed esterification and then base-catalyzed transesterification can be adopted (Al-Hamamre et al., 2012). Considering the feed application of crude coffee oil, the higher acid value is undesirable as it might lead to lipid deterioration and rancidity causing digestive distress in livestock.

3.4 Caffeine content in defatted SCG and theoretical solubility

In this study instead of determining the caffeine content in the coffee oil, the solvent’s efficacy in decaffeinating SCGs was estimated by measuring the caffeine content in the defatted SCG flour. The caffeine content in the solvent defatted SCGs residue was highest in hexane (1.73 mg/g), followed by dry 2-MeOx and measured least in aqueous 2-MeOx (95.5%) as shown in Figure 3a. Coffee oil extracted from SCGs is known to contain varying quantities of caffeine. Araújo et al. (2019) reported 23.06 mg caffeine in hexane extracted coffee oil from SCG.

In the same study 64.05 mg of caffeine was found in SCE oil (CO2) and when ethanol was employed as co-solvent the caffeine content in the oil increased several fold (Araújo et al., 2019). Mitraka et al. (2021) optimized the recovery of caffeine from SCG with ASE technique and determined the optimal values (7 min, 75 °C and ethanol: water ratio 5:95) for obtaining 30.5 ppm of caffeine concentration in the extract. The caffeine content in SCG and its recovery are dependent on two critical attributes of coffee: a) coffee type, which holds information such as geographical origin, ratio Arabica to Robusta, etc. b) nature of processing which gives insights on preparation conditions like filtration, boiling, decoction, and usage instructions recommended by the coffee maker (Peshev et al., 2018).

Theoretical solubility of caffeine in solvents hexane and dry 2-MeOx was −2.84 and −1.51 respectively (Tab. 3). Values closer to 0 represent the complete solubility of the solute in the solvent system. The values obtained suggest that caffeine solubility in crude 2-MeOx (dry and aqueous) SCG extract could be relatively higher than caffeine solubility in the hexane extract. This hypothesis is supported by experimental values obtained for residual caffeine content in defatted SCG (hexane > 2-MeOx).

thumbnail Fig. 3

(a) Caffeine content in defatted SCG along with the σ-surface of the solute and solvents; (b) σ-profile; (c) σ-potential of the solute (caffeine) and solvents (hexane, 2-MeO).

Table 3

Solubility prediction of caffeine and solvent characteristics.

3.5 Non-food applications of defatted SCG: perspective

Despite the fact that the chemical composition of SCG might vary depending on a variety of parameters it predominantly comprises the following constituents: lipid, carbohydrate (cellulose, hemicellulose, polysaccharides and lignin), protein, non-protein nitrogen, tannins, fibers and other carbon-containing constituents (Karmee, 2018; Atabani et al., 2019). Apart from fuel applications of SCG such as biodiesel, bioethanol and biogas other interesting avenues for SCG valorization include biopolymer, biocomposite fabrication, carotenoid, and bioactive compound extraction. Numerous comprehensive reviews and research articles pertinent to biorefinery, valorization and cascade utilization of SCG for food and non-food applications (Fig. 4) has been reported in literature (Vardon et al., 2013; Sousa et al., 2015; Georgieva et al., 2018; Peshev et al., 2018; McNutt and He, 2019; Atabani et al., 2019). Within the purview of the biorefinery framework defatted SCG was pressed (Atelier Luma, Tarbes, France) to obtain a board-type material which when optimized can be used as a packaging alternative. Even stationaries such as enclosures for pens were fabricated where 50% of the SCG was used as ingredient in the formulation. Interestingly, coffee cups from recycled coffee grounds and other renewable resources are used for manufacturing sustainable food and beverage packaging materials and are readily available in the market for consumers (Kaffeform, Germany).

thumbnail Fig. 4

Biorefinery of spent coffee grounds focusing on non-food applications of spent coffee grounds.

4 Conclusion

Dry and aqueous 2-MeOx prove to be potential alternative solvents for defatting SCG without impairing the inherent properties of the coffee oil and the defatted flour. The crude lipid yield ranged between 12.47% to 15.84% for solvents considered. Lipid yield was higher when solvent 2-MeOx was employed for extraction. Triglycerides (> 93%) was the principal lipid class constituent of the SCG oil. Palmitic (C16) and linoleic acids were the primary fatty acids found in the oil. Theoretical solubility of caffeine in the solvent system was also elucidated. Caffeine content was relatively higher in hexane defatted flour demonstrating the selective extractability of compounds of interest displayed by 2-MeOx.

References

  • Aguilar-Raymundo VG, Sánchez-Páez R, Gutiérrez-Salomón AL, Barajas-Ramírez JA. 2019. Spent coffee grounds cookies: Sensory and texture characteristics, proximate composition, antioxidant activity, and total phenolic content. J Food Process Preserv 43: 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Hamamre Z, Foerster S, Hartmann F, Kröger M, Kaltschmitt M. 2012. Oil extracted from spent coffee grounds as a renewable source for fatty acid methyl ester manufacturing. Fuel 96: 70–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Araújo MN, Azevedo AQPL, Hamerski F, Voll FAP, Corazza ML. 2019. Enhanced extraction of spent coffee grounds oil using high-pressure CO2 plus ethanol solvents. Ind Crops Prod 141: 111723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Atabani AE, Al-Muhtaseb AH, Kumar G, et al. 2019. Valorization of spent coffee grounds into biofuels and value-added products: Pathway towards integrated bio-refinery. Fuel 254: 115640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Battista F, Zanzoni S, Strazzera G, Andreolli M, Bolzonella D. 2020. The cascade biorefinery approach for the valorization of the spent coffee grounds. Renew Energy 157: 1203–1211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Breil C, Meullemiestre A, Vian M, Chemat F. 2016. Bio-based solvents for green extraction of lipids from oleaginous yeast biomass for sustainable. Molecules 21(2): 196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cameron A, O’Malley S. 2016. Coffee Ground Recovery Program Summary Report, Planetark. https://planetark.org/documents/doc-1397-summaryreport-of-feasibility-study-april-2016.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Campos-Vega R, Loarca-Piña G, Vergara-Castañeda HA, Dave Oomah B. 2015. Spent coffee grounds: A review on current research and future prospects. Trends Food Sci Technol 45: 24–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chemat F, Vian MA, Ravi HK, et al. 2019. Review of alternative solvents for green extraction of food and natural products: Panorama, principles, applications and prospects. Molecules 24. [Google Scholar]
  • Chemat F, Vian MA, Ravi HK. 2021. Toward petroleum-free with plant-based chemistry. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 28: 100450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Claux O, Rapinel V, Goupy P, et al. 2021. Dry and aqueous 2-methyloxolane as green solvents for simultaneous production of soybean oil and defatted meal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9: 7211–7223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Efthymiopoulos I, Hellier P, Ladommatos N, Eveleigh A, Mills-Lamptey B. 2019a. Factors affecting the efficiency of pressurized solvent extraction of oil from spent coffee grounds. Detritus 5: 75–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Efthymiopoulos I, Hellier P, Ladommatos N, Mills-Lamptey B. 2019b. Transesterification of high-acidity spent coffee ground oil and subsequent combustion and emissions characteristics in a compression-ignition engine. Fuel 247: 257–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • European Coffee Report 2018/2019. https://www.ecf-coffee.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/European-Coffee-Report-2018-2019.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Georgieva SS, Coelho JAP, Campos FC, Robalo MP, Stateva RP. 2018. Green extraction of high added value substances from spent coffee grounds: Preliminary results. J Chem Technol Metall 53: 640–646. [Google Scholar]
  • Gharby S, Ravi HK, Guillaume D, Abert Vian M, Chemat F, Charrouf Z. 2020. 2-methyloxolane as alternative solvent for lipid extraction and its effect on the cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) seed oil fractions. OCL 27: 27. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Karmee SK. 2018. A spent coffee grounds based biorefinery for the production of biofuels, biopolymers, antioxidants and biocomposites. Waste Manage 72: 240–254. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leow Y, Yew PYM, Chee PL, Loh XJ, Kai D. 2021. Recycling of spent coffee grounds for useful extracts and green composites. RSC Adv 11: 2682–2692. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Loyao AS, Villasica SLG, Dela Peña PLL, Go AW. 2018. Extraction of lipids from spent coffee grounds with non-polar renewable solvents as alternative. Ind Crops Prod 119: 152–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McNutt J, He Q (Sophia). 2019. Spent coffee grounds: A review on current utilization. J Ind Eng Chem 71: 78–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitraka GC, Kontogiannopoulos KN, Batsioula M, Banias GF, Assimopoulou AN. 2021. Spent coffee grounds’ valorization towards the recovery of caffeine and chlorogenic acid: A response surface methodology approach. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13. [Google Scholar]
  • Muangrat R, Pongsirikul I. 2019. Recovery of spent coffee grounds oil using supercritical CO2: Extraction optimization and physicochemical properties of oil. CYTA – J Food 17: 334–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Murthy PS, Naidu M. 2012. Sustainable management of coffee industry by-products and value addition – A review. Resour Conserv Recycl 66: 45–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peshev D, Mitev D, Peeva L, Peev G. 2018. Valorization of spent coffee grounds – A new approach. Separat Purificat Technol 192: 271–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rapinel V, Claux O, Abert-Vian M, et al. 2020. 2-methyloxolane (2-MeOx) as sustainable lipophilic solvent to substitute hexane for green extraction of natural products. Properties, applications, and perspectives. Molecules 25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ravi HK, Vian MA, Tao Y, et al. 2019. Alternative solvents for lipid extraction and their effect on protein quality in black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae. J Clean Prod 238. [Google Scholar]
  • Santos ÉM dos, Macedo LM de, Tundisi LL, et al. 2021. Coffee by-products in topical formulations: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol 111: 280–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sicaire AG, Vian M, Fine F, et al. 2015. Alternative bio-based solvents for extraction of fat and oils: Solubility prediction, global yield, extraction kinetics, chemical composition and cost of manufacturing. Int J Mol Sci 16: 8430–8453. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smets R, Goos P, Claes J, Van Der Borght M. 2021. Optimisation of the lipid extraction of fresh black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran by response surface methodology. Separat Purificat Technol 258: 118040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Somnuk K, Eawlex P, Prateepchaikul G. 2017. Optimization of coffee oil extraction from spent coffee grounds using four solvents and prototype-scale extraction using circulation process. Agric Nat Resour 51: 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa C, Gabriel C, Cerqueira F, Manso MC, Vinha AF. 2015. Coffee industrial waste as a natural source of bioactive compounds with antibacterial and antifungal activities. In: Méndez-Vilas A, ed. The battle against microbial pathogens: Basic science, technological advances and educational programs, pp. 131–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Vardon DR, Moser BR, Zheng W, et al. 2013. Complete utilization of spent coffee grounds to produce biodiesel, bio-oil, and biochar. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1: 1286–1294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Chemat A, Ravi HK, Hostequin AC, Burney H, Tomao V, Fabiano-Tixier A-S. 2022. Valorization of spent coffee grounds by 2-methyloxolane as bio-based solvent extraction. Viable pathway towards bioeconomy for lipids and biomaterials. OCL 29: 7.

All Tables

Table 1

Crude lipid yield of SCG and other biomaterials.

Table 2

Fatty acid profile solvent extracted SCG oils.

Table 3

Solubility prediction of caffeine and solvent characteristics.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Chemical composition of spent coffee grounds.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

(a) Lipid class composition; (b) HPTLC plate; (c) Overlay of chromatograms; (d–f) Individual chromatogram with substance assignment. TAG: Triacylglycerides; FFA: Free fatty acids; DAG: Diacylglycerides.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

(a) Caffeine content in defatted SCG along with the σ-surface of the solute and solvents; (b) σ-profile; (c) σ-potential of the solute (caffeine) and solvents (hexane, 2-MeO).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Biorefinery of spent coffee grounds focusing on non-food applications of spent coffee grounds.

In the text

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.