Open Access
Numéro
OCL
Volume 21, Numéro 4, July-August 2014
Numéro d'article D408
Nombre de pages 10
Section Dossier: Protein sources in animal feed / Les sources de protéines dans l’alimentation du bétail
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2014020
Publié en ligne 20 juin 2014
  • Archimède H, Bastianelli D, Boval M, Tran G, Sauvant D. 2011. Ressources tropicales : disponibilité et valeur alimentaire. Prod. Anim. 24: 23–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Barretto AGOP, Berndes G, Sparovek G, Wirsenius S. 2013. Agricultural intensification in Brazil and its effects on land use patterns: An analysis of the 1975–2006 period. Glob. Chang. Biology. 19: 1804–1815 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bouwman AF, Van der Hoek KW, Eickhout B, Soenario I. 2005. Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agric. Syst. 84: 121–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bowman MS, Soares-Filho BS, Merry FD, Nepstad DC, Rodrigues H, Almeida OT. 2012. Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: A spatial analysis of the rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy 29: 558–568. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bryant HL, Gogichaishvili I, Anderson D et al. 2012. The value of post-extracted algae residue. Algal Res. 1: 185–193 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY. 2004. Water footprints of nations, Vol. 2: Appendices. Value of Water Research Report Series (p. 240). Delft, The Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE. [Google Scholar]
  • De Haan C, Gerber P, Opio C. 2010. Structural changes in the Livestock sector. In H Mooney, L Neville, H Steinfeld, F Schneider (Eds.), Livestock in a Changing Landscape Vol. 1 Drivers, Consequences, and Responses. Island Press, 2010, pp. 35-50. [Google Scholar]
  • Ehui S, Li-Pun H, Mares V, Shapiro B. 1998. The role of livestock in food security and environmental protection. Outlook Agr. 27: 81–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Erb K-H, Haberl H, Krausmann F, Lauk C, Plutzar C, Steinberger JK, Pollack G. 2009. Eating the planet: feeding and fuelling the world sustainably, fairly and humanely - a scoping study. Social Ecology Working Paper (p. 134). Vienna: Institute of Social Ecology, Klagenfurt University. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2013. FAOSTAT. Domains Commodity balances and Production. Retrieved May 2013 http://faostat3.fao.org [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 1996. Technical Conversion Factors for Agricultural Commodities. Rome: FAO, 782 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Garnett T. 2009. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers. environ. sci. policy 12: 491–503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Tempio G. 2013. Tackling climate change through livestock - A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities (p. 139). Rome: FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Havlik P, Herrero M, Mosnier A, Obersteiner M, Schmid E, Fuss S. 2011. Production system based global livestock sector modeling: Good news for the future. Paper presented at the European Association of Agricultural Economists 2011 International Congress, Zurich, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • Herrero M, Thornton PK, Kruska R, Reid RS. 2008. Systems dynamics and the spatial distribution of methane emissions from African domestic ruminants to 2030. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 126: 122–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Cotty T, Dorin B. 2012. A global foresight on food crop needs for livestock. Animal 6: 1528-1536. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Millen DD, Arrigoni MDB. 2013. Drivers of change in animal protein production systems: Changes from traditional’ to “modern” beef cattle production systems in Brazil. Animal Frontiers 3: 56–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nellemann C, MacDevette M, Manders T et al. 2009. The environmental food crisis. The environment’s role in averting future food crises. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). GRID-Arendal, 104 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Paillard S, Treyer S, Dorin B. 2010. Agrimonde. Scénarios et défis pour nourrir le monde en 2050. Versailles: Quae. [Google Scholar]
  • Searchinger T. 2008. The impacts of biofuels on greenhouse gases: how land use change alters the equation. Policy Brief. Washington, DC, The German Marshall Fund of the United States. [Google Scholar]
  • Searchinger T. 2013. Creating a Sustainable Food Future. 2013. A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050. In World Resources Report 2013–14: Interim Findings. Washington: WRI, 154 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sebillotte M, Messéan A. (2003). Prospective et orientations des recherches. Le cas des protéines à l’INRA. Fourrages 174: 129–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Speedy AW. Overview of world feed protein needs and supply. In FAO, Ed. Protein sources for the animal feed industry. Rome: FAO, 2004, pp. 9–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Stehfest E, Bouwman L, van Vuuren DP, den Elzen MGJ, Eickhout B, Kabat P. 2009. Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change 95: 83–102. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, Haan Cd. 2006. Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. [Google Scholar]
  • Strassburg B. 2012. Increasing agricultural output while avoiding deforestation: A case study for Mato Grosso. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: International Institute for Sustainability, 43 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Tacon AGJ, Hasan MR, Metian M. Demand and supply of feed ingredients for farmed fish and crustaceans: trends and prospects. In FAO, Ed. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. Rome: FAO, 2011, 87 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Toride Y. Lysine and other amino acids for feed: production and contribution to protein utilization in animal feeding. In FAO, Ed. Protein sources for the animal feed industry. Rome: FAO, 2004, pp. 161–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Tourrand JF, Veiga JB, Poccard-Chapuis R, Hostiou N, Ferreira LA, et al. 2004. The effects of cattle ranching on land use of family holdings in the eastern-Amazon region of Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasal SK. 2004. The role of high lysine cereals in animal and human nutrition in Asia. In FAO (Ed.), Protein sources for the animal feed industry. Rome: FAO, 2004, pp. 167-184. [Google Scholar]
  • Veldkamp T, Van Duinkerken G, Van Huis A et al. 2012. Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets – a feasibility study. Lelystad: Wageningen UR Livestock Research, 62 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wanapaz M. 2004. Current livestock production and protein sources as animal feeds in Thailand. In FAO (Ed.), Protein sources for the animal feed industry. Rome: FAO, 2004, pp. 199-214. [Google Scholar]
  • Wirsenius S, Azar C, Berndes G. 2010. How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030? Agric. Syst. 103: 621–638. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.