Open Access
Table 2
Overview of six French evaluation methods of sustainability in agriculture (adapted from Feschet and Bockstaller, 2014).
| Name of the method | Period of construction | Type of production | Scale | Dimensions of | Decomposition | Number o | Number of indicators | Comments: objectives, type of indicators, aggregation method |
| sustainability | of sustainability | main | ||||||
| considered | in | criteria | ||||||
|
|
||||||||
| IDEA (Zahm et al., 2008) | 2000–2008 | Arable, livestock, winegrowing | Farm | Economic, social and environmental | Scale/ component/ indicator | 10 | 42 | Evaluation of sustainability at farm level to |
| make farmers sensitive to this stake. Use of | ||||||||
| causal indicators for environmental dimension, | ||||||||
| sum of scores within each dimension. The | ||||||||
| global sustainability score is the worst of the | ||||||||
| three dimensions | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Diagnostic de | 2010 | Dairy production | Farm | Economic, social and environmental | Dimension/ criteria/ indicator | 18 | 34 | Evaluation of sustainability at farm level to |
| durabilité – RAD | make farmers sensitive to this stake. No | |||||||
| (Féret, 2004) | aggregation of indicators. | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
| DAESE – OTPA (Guillaumin et al., 2007) | 2003–2007 | Arable, livestock, winegrowing | Farm | Economic, social environmental | Axis/ compartment/ indicator | 19 | 120 | A large range of (causal) indicators to monitor |
| change in management regarding sustainability | ||||||||
| for a farm network at regional (national) level. | ||||||||
| No aggregation. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| EVAD (Rey-Valette et al., 2009) | 2005–2008 | Aquaculture | Farm, | Economic, | Dimension/ | 13 | 230 | Decision aid tool for action, design and |
| production | social, institutionala and | principles/ | selection of a wide range of indicators (from | |||||
| sector/ | environmental | criteria/ | different types) | |||||
| landscape | indicator | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
| MASC 2.0 (Craheix et al., 2012) | 2005–2012 | Arable crops | Cropping system | Economic, social and environmental | Dimension/ | 8 | 39 | Evaluate and rank cropping systems by |
| aggregated | identifying strong and weak points regarding | |||||||
| criteria/ | sustainability. Use of predictive effect | |||||||
| basic criteria/ | indicators when possible. | |||||||
| indicator | Aggregation thanks to DEXi software. | |||||||
|
|
||||||||
| DEXiPM (Pelzer et al., 2012) | 2007–2011 | Arable crops | Cropping system | Economic, social and environmental | Dimension/ | 8 | 61 | Rapid ex ante evaluation of innovative |
| caggregated | cropping systems to select the most performant | |||||||
| criteria/ | ones. Causal qualitative indicators aggregated | |||||||
| basic criteria/ | in qualitative predictive effect indicators. | |||||||
| indicator/ | Aggregation with DEXi software | |||||||
| practices | ||||||||
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.