Rapeseed / Colza
Open Access
Volume 30, 2023
Rapeseed / Colza
Article Number 18
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2023019
Published online 14 August 2023
  • Abdelmigid HM. 2012. Efficiency of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers for genotype fingerprinting and genetic diversity studies in canola. Afr J Biotechnol 11(24): 6409–6419. [Google Scholar]
  • Ana MJ, Ankica KS, Dejana SP, Radovan M, Nikola H. 2009. Phenotypic and molecular evaluation of genetic diversity of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes. Afr J Biotechnol 8(19). [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson A, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36(1): 181–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Caroli S, Santoni S, Ronfort J. 2011. AMaCAID: a useful tool for accurate marker choice for accession identification and discrimination. Mol Ecol Resour 11(4): 733–738. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chesnokov YV, Artemyeva AM. 2015. Evaluation of the measure of polymorphism information of genetic diversity. Agric Biol 50(5): 571–578. [Google Scholar]
  • DDFP. 2022. Statistiques sur les cultures oléagineuses au Maroc. Direction de Développement des Filières de Production (DDFP), Ministère de l’Agriculture, de la Pêche Maritime, du Développement Rural et des Eaux et Forêts. [Google Scholar]
  • Guirrou I, El Harrak A, El Antari A, et al. 2023. Bioactive compounds assessment in six Moroccan rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties grown in two contrasting environments. Agronomy 13(2): 460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Madre JF. 2013. Logiciel mesurim Pro. Ver. 3,4. Académie d’Améins (accessed on 29 May 2022). [Google Scholar]
  • Mahjoob B, Zarini HN, Hashemi SH, Shamasbi FV. 2016. Comparison of ISSR, IRAP and REMAP markers for assessing genetic diversity in different species of Brassica spp. Russian J Genet 52(12): 1272–1281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maraş-vanlioğlu FG, Yaman H, Kayaçetin F. 2020. Genetic diversity analysis of some species in Brassicaceae family with ISSR markers. Biotechnol Stud 29(1): 38–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McVetty PB, Mietkiewska E, Omonov T, Curtis J, Taylor DC, Weselake RJ. 2016. Brassica spp. oils. Industrial oil crops. AOCS Press, pp. 113–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Nabloussi A. 2015. Amélioration génétique du colza : enjeux et réalisations pour un développement durable de la filière. ISBN: 978-9954-593-27-1. Rabat, Morocco : INRA. [Google Scholar]
  • Nagaraju J, Kathirvel M, Kumar RR, Siddiq EA, Hasnain SE. 2002. Genetic analysis of traditional and evolved Basmati and non-basmati rice varieties by using fluorescence-based ISSR-PCR and SSR markers. Proc Nat Acad Sci 99(9): 5836–5841. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Paul M, Islam T, Hoque MI, Sarker RH. 2020. Analysis of genetic diversity in oilseed Brassica germplasm through ISSR markers and isozyme profiling. Bangladesh J Bot 49(1): 147–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, et al. 1996. The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2(3): 225–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradeep AR, Chatterjee SN, Nair CV. 2005. Genetic differentiation induced by selection in an inbred population of the silkworm Bombyx mori, revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker systems. J Appl Genet 46(3): 291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradeep Reddy M, Sarla N, Siddiq EA. 2002. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica 128(1): 9–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rohlf FJ. 2002. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy System, ver. 2.1. Setauket, New York: Exeter Publishing Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  • Safari S, Mehrabi AA, Safari Z. 2013. Efficiency of RAPD and ISSR markers in assessment of genetic diversity in Brassica napus genotypes. Int J Agric Crop Sci (IJACS) 5(3): 273–279. [Google Scholar]
  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard R. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Nat Acad Sci 81(24): 8014–8018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma HK, Kumar A, Singh VV, et al. 2022. Genetic resources of brassicas. Cash Crops: Genetic Diversity, Erosion, Conservation and Utilization: 285–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sica M, Gamba G, Montieri S, Gaudio L, Aceto S. 2005. ISSR markers show differentiation among Italian populations of Asparagus acutifolius L. BMC Genet 6(1): 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal RR, Michener CD. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 38: 1409–1438. [Google Scholar]
  • Swarup S, Cargill EJ, Crosby K, Flagel L, Kniskern J, Glenn KC. 2021. Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops. Crop Sci 61(2): 839–852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Talhinhas P, Neves-Martins J, Leitao J. 2003. AFLP, ISSR and RAPD markers reveal high levels of genetic diversity among Lupinus spp. Plant Breed 122(6): 507–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tarıkahya-Hacıoğlu B. 2016. Molecular diversity of the wild Crambe (Brassicaceae) taxa in Turkey detected by intersimple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Ind Crops Prod 80: 214–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ton LB, Neik TX, Batley J. 2020. The use of genetic and gene technologies in shaping modern rapeseed cultivars (Brassica napus L.). Genes 11(10): 1161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiesner I, Wiesnerová D. 2003. Effect of resolving medium and staining procedure on inter-simple-sequence-repeat (ISSR) patterns in cultivated flax germplasm. Genetic Resour Crop Evol 50(8): 849–853. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu C, Leišová L, Kučera V, et al. 2007. Assessment of genetic diversity of yellow-seeded rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) accessions by AFLP markers. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 43(3): 105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20(2): 176–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.