Open Access
Review
Issue
OCL
Volume 24, Number 3, May–June 2017
Article Number D304
Number of page(s) 12
Section Agro-ecology / Agro-écologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017020
Published online 03 May 2017
  • Agreste. 2013. Les indicateurs de fréquence de traitement (IFT) en 2011. AGRESTE, Les Dossiers (18): 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Agreste. 2014. La fertilisation. AGRESTE, Les Dossiers (21): 27–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmed S, Tourvieille de Labrouhe D, Delmotte F. 2012. Emerging virulence arising from hybridisation facilitated by multiple introductions of the sunflower downy mildew pathogen Plasmopara halstedii. Fungal Genet Biol 49: 847–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Altieri MA, Rosset PM. 1995. Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to sustainable management. Int J Environ Stud 50: 165–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andrade JF, Cerrudo A, Rizzalli RH, Monzon JP. 2012. Sunflower-soybean intercrop productivity under different water conditions and sowing managements. Agron J 104: 1049–1055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Angadi SV, Entz MH. 2002. Root system and water use patterns of different height sunflower cultivars. Agron J 94: 136–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Attoumani-Ronceux A, Aubertot J-N., Guichard L, et al. 2010. Guide pratique pour la conception de systèmes de culture plus économes en produits phytosanitaires. Application aux systèmes de polyculture. Ministères chargés de l'agriculture et de l'environnement, RMT SdCI, 80 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Aubertot J-N, Barbier J-M, Carpentier A, et al., eds. 2005. Pesticides, agriculture et environnement. Réduire l'utilisation des pesticides et limiter leurs impacts environnementaux. Stratégies de protection des cultures. In : Rapport d'expertise scientifique collective. France : Inra et Cemagref, 117 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Aubertot J-N., Robin M-H. 2013. Injury Profile SIMulator, a qualitative aggregative modelling framework to predict crop injury profile as a function of cropping practices, soil, climate and field environment. I. Conceptual bases. PLoS ONE 8: e73202. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Babu S, Rana DS, Yadav GS, Singh R, Yadav SK. 2014. A review on recycling of sunflower residue for sustaining soil health. Int J Agron: 601049. [Google Scholar]
  • Bedoussac L, Journet E-P., Hauggaard-Nielsen H, et al. 2015. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 911–935. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • BIO IS. 2010. Analyses de cycle de vie appliquées aux biocarburants de première génération consommés en France. Rapport final. Coordination ADEME, 236 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchet R. 1992. Tournesol : une culture pour l'environnement. Oléoscope 9: 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Brouder SM, Gomez-Macpherson H. 2014. The impact of conservation agriculture on smallholder agricultural yields: A scoping review of the evidence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 187: 11–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruehl GW. 1987. Soilborne plant pathogens. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Cabelguenne M, Debaeke P. 1998. Experimental determination and modelling of the soil water extraction capacities of maize, sunflower, soybean, sorghum and wheat. Plant Soil 202: 175–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Calvino P, Monzon J. 2009. Farming systems of Argentina: yield constraints and risk management. In: Sadras VO, Calderini DF, eds. Crop physiology. Applications for genetic improvement and agronomy. San Diego (California): Academic Press, pp. 51–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Casadebaig P, Guilioni L, Lecoeur J, Christophe A, Champolivier L, Debaeke P. 2011. SUNFLO, a model to simulate genotype-specific performance of the sunflower crop in contrasting environments. Agric Forest Meteorol 151: 163–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ceccon P, Debaeke P, Gonzalez-Fernandez P. 2000. Environmental issues of sunflower. In: Proceedings of 15th International Sunflower Conference, Toulouse, 12–15 juin 2000, ISA, I, Pl.C, pp. 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Chambre d'agriculture Occitanie. 2016. Bulletin de santé du végétal : bilan 2016 tournesol. Midi-Pyrénées : Édition Aquitaine, 18 p. Disponible sur http://www.mp.chambagri.fr/IMG/pdf/BSV_bilan_tournesol_2016.pdf, accessed January 20th 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Champolivier L, Debaeke P, Merrien A. 2011. Pourquoi irriguer le tournesol, une culture réputée tolérante à la sécheresse ? Innov Agron 14: 151–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Connor DJ, Hall A. 1997. Sunflower physiology. In: Schneiter AA, ed. Sunflower technology and production. Agronomy monograph 35. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA and SSSA, pp. 113–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Craheix D, Angevin F, Doré T, de Tourdonnet S. 2016. Using a multicriteria assessment model to evaluate the sustainability of conservation agriculture at the cropping system level in France. Eur J Agron 76: 75–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Cabelguenne M, Hilaire A, Raffaillac D. 1998. Crop management systems for rainfed and irrigated sunflower (Helianthus annuus) in southwestern France. J Agric Sci (Camb) 131: 171–185. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Estragnat A, Reau R. 2003. Influence of crop management on sunflower stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi.). Agronomie 23: 581–592. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Mestries E, Desanlis M, Seassau C. 2014. Effects of crop management on the incidence and severity of fungal diseases in sunflower. In: Arribas JE, ed. Sunflowers: growth and development, environmental influences and pests/diseases. New York, USA: Nova Science Pubs, pp. 201–226. [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Casadebaig P, Flenet F, Langlade N. 2017. Sunflower crop and climate change: vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential from case-studies in Europe. OCL 24(1): D102. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Delaplane KS, Mayer DF. 2000. Crop pollination by bees. New York: CABI. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Delos M, Eychenne N, Flocher L, et al. 2004. Les méthodes alternatives pour lutter contre les maladies en grandes cultures. Phytoma Déf Vég 567: 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Desanlis M, Aubertot J-N, Mestries E, Debaeke P. 2013. Analysis of the influence of a sunflower canopy on Phomopsis helianthi epidemics as a function of cropping practices. Field Crops Res 149: 63–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Duru M, Therond O, Martin G, et al. 2015. How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 1259–1281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Echarte L, Della Maggiora A, Cerrudo D, et al. 2011. Yield response to plant density of maize and sunflower intercropped with soybean. Field Crops Res 121: 423–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Franco JG, Saliendra N, Sanderson M, Liebig M, Archer D. 2016. Long-term agroecosystem research: the potential for sunflower to provide multiple ecosystem services in diverse cropping systems. In: National Sunflower Association Research Forum, Fargo (ND), USA, Jan 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • de la Fuente EB, Suárez SA, Lenardis AE, Poggio SL. 2014. Intercropping sunflower and soybean in intensive farming systems: evaluating yield advantage and effect on weed and insect assemblages. NJAS Wagening J Life Sci 70–71: 47–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths DA, 1970. The fine structure of developing microsclerotia of Verticillium dahliae Kleb. Arch Mikrobiol 74: 207–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jones GA, Sieving KE. 2006. Intercropping sunflower in organic vegetables to augment bird predators of arthropods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117: 171–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jouffret P, Labalette F, Thibierge J. 2011. Atouts et besoins en innovations du tournesol pour une agriculture durable. Innov Agron 14: 59–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Kandel HJ, Schneiter AA, Johnson BL. 1997. Intercropping legumes into sunflower at different growth stages. Crop Sci 37: 1532–1537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kirkegaard JA, Sarwar M, Matthiessen JN. 1998. Assessing the biofumigation potential of crucifers. Acta Horticult 459: 105–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Landé N, Jouffret P, Tribouillois H, et al. 2012. Evaluating economic and technical performances of sunflower-soybean intercrop in French farming systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Sunflower Conference, Mar del Plata (Argentina). [Google Scholar]
  • Larkin RP, Griffin TS. 2007. Control of soilborne potato diseases using Brassica green manures. Crop Prot 26: 1067–1077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecomte V, Longueval C. 2013. Implantation : difficile de trop simplifier en tournesol. Perspect Agric 402: 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecomte V, Nolot J-M. 2011. Place du tournesol dans le système de culture. Innov Agron 14: 59–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Lieven J, Wagner D. 2012. Résultats de l'enquête 2011 sur les pratiques du tournesol en agriculture biologique. Document Cetiom (Terres Inovia), 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Manici LM, Lazzeri L, Palmieri S. 1997. In vitro fungitoxic activity of some glucosinolates and their enzyme-derived products toward plant pathogenic fungi. J Agric Food Chem 45: 2768–2773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mestries E, Debaeke P, eds. 2016. Dix années de recherches collaboratives : résultats marquants. In : Journées d'échanges Tournesol, 28 et 29 juin 2016, Toulouse (France), 29 p. Disponible sur http://www.terresinovia.fr/fileadmin/cetiom/regions/Sud/PDF/2016/JourneesTournesol28_29_juin/DOSSIER_Tournesol_2016_10ans_UMT.pdf, accessed January 20th 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • Mestries E, Lecomte V. 2012. Tournesol et Verticillium dahliae : état des lieux et moyens de lutte pour 2013. Rencontres techniques régionales du CETIOM 2012-Sud-Ouest, 14 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Mestries E, Desanlis M, Aubertot J-N., Debaeke P. 2015. Une approche intégrée pour prendre en compte les effets de la variété, de la conduite et de l'environnement sur l'incidence et la sévérité des maladies de fin de cycle du tournesol. Innov Agron 46: 75–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Miao Q, Rosa RD, Shia H, et al. 2016. Modeling water use, transpiration and soil evaporation of spring wheat–maize and spring wheat–sunflower relay intercropping using the dual crop coefficient approach. Agric Water Manag 165: 211–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mithen RF. 1992. Leaf glucosinolate profiles and their relationship to pest and disease resistance in oilseed rape. Euphytica 63: 71–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Neubauer C, Heitmann B, Müller C. 2014. Biofumigation potential of Brassicaceae cultivars to Verticillium dahliae. Eur J Plant Pathol 140: 341–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nolot J-M., Debaeke P. 2003. Principes et outils de conception, conduite et évaluation de systèmes de culture. Cah Agric 12: 387–400. [Google Scholar]
  • de Oliveira ACV, de Moraes A, Ribeiro MFS, et al. 2012. The effect of shading on yield of sunflower production in agroforestry system with Eucalyptus. In: Second International Symposium on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Porto Alegre, (Brazil) – 8–12 Oct. 2012, 3 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Olowe VIO, Adebimpe OA. 2009. Intercropping sunflower with soyabeans enhance total crop productivity. Biol Agric Horticult 26: 365–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Panneerselvam P, Arthanari PM. 2011. Impact of nutrient management and agro-forestry systems on growth and yield of sunflower. Madras Agric J 98: 136–140. [Google Scholar]
  • Pilorgé E. 2010. Nouveau contexte environnemental et réglementaire: quel impact pour la culture du tournesol ? OCL 17: 1326–1328. [Google Scholar]
  • Plaza-Bonilla D, Nolot JM, Raffaillac D, Justes E. 2017. Innovative cropping systems to reduce N inputs and maintain wheat yields by inserting grain legumes and cover crops in southwestern France. Eur J Agron 82: 331–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson RG. 1984. Sunflower for strip, row, and relay intercropping. Agron J 76: 43–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez-Lizana A, Carbonell R, Gonzalez P, Ordonez R. 2010. N, P and K released by the field decomposition of residues of a pea-wheat-sunflower rotation. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 87: 199–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sackston WE. 1992. Managing the major plant diseases: from cultural practices to breeding for resistance. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Sunflower Conference, Pisa (Italy), pp. 687–699. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarwar M, Kirkegaard JA, Wong PTW, Desmarchelier JM. 1998. Biofumigation potential of Brassicas – III. In vitro toxicity of isothiocyanates to soil-borne fungal pathogens. Plant Soil 201: 103–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seassau C, Aubertot J-N, Debaeke P, Dechamp-Guillaume G, Mestries E, Muños S. 2016. Les avancées pour une meilleure gestion des principaux bioagresseurs du tournesol. In : Journées d'échanges Tournesol, 28 et 29 juin 2016, Toulouse (France), 35 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Shivaramu HS, Shivashankar K. 1992. Performance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and soybean (Glycine max) in intercropping with different plant populations and planting patterns. Indian J Agron 37: 231–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith BJ, Kirkegaard JA. 2002. In vitro inhibition of soil microorganisms by 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate. Plant Pathol 51: 585–593. [Google Scholar]
  • Tribouillois H, Cristante P, Estragnat A, et al. 2012. Is sunflower-soybean intercropping an efficient solution for increasing natural resources use efficiency and yield production? In: Proceedings of the 18th International Sunflower Conference, Mar del Plata (Argentina). [Google Scholar]
  • Vear F. 2016. Changes in sunflower breeding over the last fifty years. OCL 23: D202. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Willey RW, Osiru DSO. 1972. Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J Agric Sci (Camb) 79: 517–529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.