EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 24 / No 3 (May–June 2017) OCL, 24 3 (2017) D303 References
Open Access
Review
Issue
OCL
Volume 24, Number 3, May–June 2017
Article Number D303
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agro-ecology / Agro-écologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017021
Published online 12 May 2017
  • Altieri MA. 1992. Agroecological foundations of alternative agriculture in California. Agric Ecosyst Environ 39: 23–53. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(92)90203-n. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barreteau O, Antona M, d'Aquino P, et al. 2003. Our companion modelling approach. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 6 (2): 1. Disponible sur http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/1.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Benoît M, Rizzo D, Marraccini E, et al. 2012. Landscape agronomy: a new field for addressing agricultural landscape dynamics. Landsc Ecol 27: 1385–1394. [Google Scholar]
  • Berthet ET, Bretagnolle V, Segrestin B. 2014. Surmonter un blocage de l'innovation par la conception collective. Cas de la réintroduction de luzerne dans une plaine céréalière. Fourrages 217: 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonneuil C, Thomas F. 2009. Gènes, pouvoirs et profits. Recherche publique et régimes de production des savoirs de Mendel aux OGM. Paris : Quae, 619 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bos AP, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Gosselink JMJ, Bokma SJ. 2009. Reflexive interactive design and its application in a project on sustainable dairy husbandry systems. Outl Agric 38: 137–145. Available from http://doi.org/10.5367/000000009788632386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chantre E, Cerf M, Le Bail M. 2014. Transitional pathways towards input reduction on French field crop farms. Int J Agric Sustain 13: 69–86. doi:10.1080/14735903.2014.945316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clermont-Dauphin C, Cabidoche YM, Meynard JM. 2004. Effects of intensive monocropping of bananas on properties of volcanic soils in the uplands of the French West Indies. Soil Use Manag 20 (2): 105–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coquil X, Blouet A, Fiorelli JL, Bazard C, Trommenschlager JM. 2009. Conception de systèmes laitiers en agriculture biologique : une entrée agronomique. Inra Prod Anim 22: 221–234. [Google Scholar]
  • Darré JP, ed. 1994. Pairs et experts dans l'agriculture. Dialogues et production de connaissances pour l'action. Ramonville Saint-Agne, France : Éditions Erès. [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Estragnat A, Reau R. 2003. Influence of crop management on sunflower stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi). Agronomie 23(7): 581–592. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Deguine JP, Gloanec C, Laurent JP. 2016. Protection agroécologique des cultures. Versailles : Éditions Quae, 287 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dejoux JF, Meynard JM, Reau R, Roche R, Saulas P. 2003. Evaluation of environment friendly crop management systems for winter rapeseed based on very early sowing dates. Agronomie 23: 725–736. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Doré T, Sebillotte M, Meynard JM. 1997. A diagnostic method for assessing regional variation in crop yield. Agric Syst 54: 169–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doré T, Le Bail M, Martin P, Ney B, Roger-Estrade J. 2006. L'agronomie aujourd'hui. Versailles : Éditions Quae, 367 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Dorel M, Tixier P, Dural D, Zanoletti S. 2011. Alternatives aux intrants chimiques en culture bananière. Innov Agron 16: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Duru M, Thérond O, Fares M. 2015. Designing agroecological transitions. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 1237–1257. doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Etienne M, ed. 2010. Companion modelling. A participatory approach to sustainable development. Versailles : Éditions Quae. [Google Scholar]
  • Francis C, Lieblein G, Gliessman S, et al. 2003. Agroecology: the ecology of food systems. J Sustain Agric 22: 99–118. Available from http://doi.org/10.1300/J064v22n02_07. [Google Scholar]
  • Geels FW. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multilevel perspective and a case-study. Res Pol 31: 1257–1274. Available from http://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliessman SR. 2007. Agroecology: ecological processes in sustainable agriculture, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Lewis Publisher (CRC Press), 408 p. doi:10.1017/S0014479707005364. [Google Scholar]
  • Guichard L, Ballot R, Halska J, et al. 2015. AgroPEPS, un outil web collaboratif de gestion des connaissances pour produire, échanger, pratiquer, s'informer sur les systèmes de culture durables. Innov Agron 43: 83–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Guichard L, Dedieu F, Jeuffroy M-H, Meynard J-M, Reau R, Savini I. 2017. Le plan Ecophyto de réduction d'usage des pesticides en France : décryptage d'un échec et raisons d'espérer. Cah Agric 26: 14002. doi:10.1051/cagri/2017004. [Google Scholar]
  • Husson O, Tran Quoc H, Boulakia S, et al. 2015. Co-designing innovative cropping systems that match biophysical and socio-economic diversity. The DATE approach to conservation agriculture in Madagascar, Lao PDR and Cambodia. Renew Agric Food Syst 31: 452–470. doi:10.1017/S174217051500037X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Inra. 2010. Document d'orientation 2010–2020, une science pour l'impact. Disponible sur http://inra.dam.front.pad.brainsonic.com/ressources/afile/224599-e325e-resource-document-d-orientation-2010-2020.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Inra, Cirad. 2016. Agro-écologie : le positionnement des recherches de l'Inra et du Cirad. Disponible sur https://inra-dam-front-resources-cdn.brainsonic.com/ressources/afile/373359-42327-resource-agro-ecologie-positionnement-des-recherches-inra-et-cirad-2016.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacquet F, Butault JP, Guichard L. 2011. An economic analysis of the possibility of reducing pesticides in French field crops. Ecol Econ 70: 1638–1648. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  • Lamé A, Jeuffroy MH, Pelzer E, Meynard JM. 2015. Les agriculteurs sources d'innovations : exemple des associations pluri-spécifiques dans le grand Ouest de la France. Agron Environ Soc 5 (2). [Google Scholar]
  • Lamine C. 2011. Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign. Cases from organic farming and IPM. J Rural Stud 27: 209–219. doi:10.1016/j. jrurstud.2011.02.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamine C, Meynard JM, Bui S, Messéan A. 2010. Réductions d'intrants : des changements techniques, et après ? Effets de verrouillage et voies d'évolution à l'échelle du système agri-alimentaire. Innov Agron 8: 121–134. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Masson P, Weil B, Hatchuel A, Cogez P. 2012. Why aren't they locked in waiting games? Unlocking rules and the ecology of concepts in the semiconductor industry. Tech Anal Strat Manag 24(6): 617–630. Available from http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.693675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Magrini MB, Anton M, Cholez C, et al. 2016. Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system. Ecol Econ 126: 152–162. Available from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM. 2012. Innovating in cropping and farming systems (chapter 5). In: Coudel E, Devautour H, Soulard CT, Faure G, Hubert B, eds. Renewing innovation systems in agriculture and food: how to go towards more sustainability? Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 89–108. [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM, Girardin P. 1991. Produire autrement. Courr Environ 15: 1–19. Disponible sur http://www7.inra.fr/lecourrier//wp-content/uploads/2012/01/C15Girardin.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM, Doré T, Habib R. 2001. L'évaluation et la conception de systèmes de culture pour une agriculture durable. C R Acad Agric Fr 87(4): 223–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM, Dedieu B, Bos AP. 2012. Re-design and co-design of farming systems. An overview of methods and practices. In: Darnhofer I, Gibons D, Dedieu B, eds. Farming systems research into the 21st century: the new dynamic. Springer, pp. 407–432. [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM, Dourmad JY. 2014. L'innovation en élevage : de nouvelles démarches pour de nouveaux enjeux. In : Ingrand S, Baumont R, eds. Quelles innovations pour quels systèmes d'élevage ? Inra Prod Anim 27, numéro spécial. [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM, Messéan A, Charlier A, et al. 2015. La diversification des cultures : lever les obstacles agronomiques et économiques. Versailles : Éditions Quae, 106 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Meynard JM, Jeuffroy MH, Le Bail M, Lefèvre A, Magrini MB, Michon C. 2016. Designing coupled innovations for the sustainability transition of agrifood systems. Agric Syst. Available from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.08.002. [Google Scholar]
  • Mischler P, Lheureux S, Dumoulin F, et al. 2009. En Picardie, 8 fermes de grande culture engagées en production intégrée réduisent fortement les pesticides sans baisse de marge. Courr Environ 57: 73–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. PNAS 104(39): 15181–15187. Available from http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104. [Google Scholar]
  • de Sainte Marie C. 2014. Rethinking agri-environmental schemes. A result-oriented approach to the management of species-rich grasslands in France. J Environ Plan Manag 57(5): 704–719. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.763772. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Salembier C, Elverdin JH, Meynard JM. 2016. Tracking on-farm innovations to unearth alternatives to the dominant soybean-based system in the Argentinean Pampa. Agron Sustain Dev 36. [Google Scholar]
  • Stuart D, Worosz MR. 2012. Risk, anti-reflexivity, and ethical neutralization in industrial food processing. Agric Hum Values 29: 287–301. Available from http://doi.org/10.1007/ s10460-011-9337-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toffolini Q, Jeuffroy MH, Prost L. 2016. Indicators used by farmers to design agricultural systems: a survey. Agron Sustain Dev 36: 5. doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0340-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanloqueren G, Baret P. 2008. Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in’ case study. Ecol Econ 66: 436–446. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.007. [Google Scholar]
  • Viaux P. 2013. Systèmes intégrés : une troisième voie en grande culture, 2e éd. Éditions La France Agricole, coll. « Agri production ». [Google Scholar]
  • Voisin AS, Guéguen J, Huyghe C, et al. 2014. Legumes for feed, food, biomaterials and bioenergy in Europe: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 343: 361–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Warner KD. 2007. Agroecology in action; extending alternative agriculture through social networks. London, UK: The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C. 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29: 503–515. doi:10.1051/agro/2009004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, Peigné J. 2014. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 14: 1–20. doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7. [Google Scholar]
  • Wezel A, Brives H, Casagrande M, Clément C, Dufour A, Vandenbroucke P. 2016. Agroecology territories: places for sustainable agricultural and food systems and biodiversity conservation. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 40(2): 132–144. doi:10.1080/21683565.2015.1115799. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.