| Issue |
OCL
Volume 28, 2021
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 12 | |
| Number of page(s) | 3 | |
| Section | Agronomy | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2020074 | |
| Published online | 10 February 2021 | |
Data Paper
Proteomic data from leaves of twenty-four sunflower genotypes under water deficit
Données protéomiques produites à partir de vingt-quatre génotypes de tournesol soumis à un déficit hydrique
1
LIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS,
Castanet-Tolosan, France
2
Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, GQE–Le Moulon, PAPPSO,
91190
Gif-sur-Yvette, France
* Correspondence: michel.zivy@inrae.fr
Received:
11
May
2020
Accepted:
17
December
2020
This article describes a proteomic data set produced from sunflower plants subjected to water deficit. Twenty-four sunflower genotypes were selected to represent genetic diversity within cultivated sunflower. They included both inbred lines and their hybrids. Water deficit was applied to plants in pots at the vegetative stage using the high-throughput phenotyping platform Heliaphen. We present here the identification of 3062 proteins and the quantification of 1211 of them in the leaves of the 24 genotypes grown under two watering conditions. These data allow the study of both the effects of genetic variations and watering conditions. They constitute a valuable resource for the community to study adaptation of crops to drought and the molecular basis of heterosis.
Résumé
Cet article décrit un jeu de données protéomiques produites à partir de plantes de tournesol soumises ou non à un déficit hydrique. Vingt-quatre génotypes incluant des lignées pures et leurs hybrides ont été sélectionnés pour représenter la diversité génétique des tournesols cultivés. Les plantes ont été cultivées en pots sur la plateforme Heliaphen de phénotypage à haut débit et le déficit hydrique a été appliqué à un stade végétatif. Nous présentons l’identification de 3062 protéines et la quantification de 1211 d’entre elles dans les feuilles des vingt-quatre génotypes cultivés dans les deux conditions d’arrosage. Ces données permettent d’étudier l’effet des variations génétiques et du déficit hydrique sur le protéome. Elles sont une ressource intéressante pour la communauté, permettant d’étudier l’adaptation des plantes cultivées à la sécheresse et les bases moléculaires de l’hétérosis.
Key words: Helianthus / abiotic stress / proteomics / drought / heterosis
Mots clés : Helianthus / stress abiotique / protéomique / sécheresse / hétérosis
© T. Balliau et al., Hosted by EDP Sciences, 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Specifications table
| Subject area | Biology |
| More specific subject area | Proteomics |
| Type of data | Peptide and protein identification; protein quantification |
| How data was acquired | Mass spectrometry (LC-MS) |
| Data format | mzXML open format for raw mass spectrometry data; opendocument format for protein identification (.ods file); R data file for protein quantification (.RData file) |
| Experimental factors | 24 genotypes of Helianthus annuus in two environmental conditions (irrigated or not) with 3 replicates |
| Experimental features | Identification and quantification of sunflower leaf proteins |
| Data source location | The outdoor Heliaphen phenotyping platform at the Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA) station, Auzeville, France (43°31’41.8”N, 1°29’58.6”E) |
| Data accessibility | These data are publicly available in ProticDB with following DOI: https://doi.org/10.15454/TW59-P718 |
| Related research article | Badouin et al., 2017; Blanchet et al., 2018 |
2 Value of the data
Climate change is a current issue of major concern because of its actual effects on biodiversity and the agricultural sector. A better understanding of the adaptation of plants to this recent phenomenon is therefore of major interest to crop science and society. Helianthus annuus L., the domesticated sunflower, is the fourth most important oilseed crop in the world (USDA, 2020). It is promising for agriculture adaptation to climate change as it can maintain yield better than most other crops in a wide range of environments, especially during drought stress (Debaeke and Bertrand, 2008; Debaeke et al., 2017). It constitutes an archetypical systems biology model, as response to drought stress involves many molecular pathways and subsequent physiological processes. In addition, heterosis is a phenomenon commonly used to improve yield in allogamous crops such as sunflower. To study its impact on the response to drought at the molecular level, we analysed the leaf proteome of twenty-four genotypes of cultivated sunflower comprising four maintainer lines, four restorer lines and their 16 hybrids, that were either well watered or subjected to water deficit. Different ecophysiological traits were measured on these plants (Blanchet et al., 2018), making it possible to study the relationships between protein expression and plant traits as a function of water stress and heterozygosity.
3 Data
This dataset provides identification and quantification data for proteins of sunflower leaves from 142 plants distributed in 24 genotypes grown in water deficit (WD) or well watered (WW) conditions with 3 replicates (two missing data).
The raw data associated with this article (data from the mass spectrometer in mzXML format) as well as annotated spectra, identification and quantitative data can be found at the following link https://doi.org/10.15454/TW59-P718 or directly at http://moulon.inra.fr/protic/sunrise. Parameters used for mass spectrometry analyses are shown in Table 1.
Parameters used for mass spectrometry analyses.
4 Experimental design, plant material and growth conditions
One hundred and forty-four plants corresponding to 24 genotypes (four female lines [SF009, SF092, SF109 and SF109], four male lines [SF279, SF317, SF326, SF342]) and their 16 hybrids were grown under two treatment conditions (WW and WD), with three plants per genotype and per treatment.
The experiment design and plant material are fully described in Blanchet et al. (2018). Briefly, the experiment was performed in the outdoor Heliaphen phenotyping platform at the Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE) station, Auzeville, France. The growth conditions were as previously described in Gosseau et al. (2019). In summary, seeds were germinated in Petri dishes for 78 h at 28 °C, then germinated plantlets were transplanted in 15 L pots in the Heliaphen platform. Pots were covered with a polystyrene sheet to prevent evaporation from the soil.
Pots were normally irrigated, according to Rengel et al. (2012), up to 38 days after germination (DAG; ∼20-leaf stage corresponding to bud formation phase (Schneiter and Miller, 1981). At this stage, irrigation of WD plants was stopped. Soil evaporation was estimated according to Marchand et al. (2013). Both WW and WD plants were weighed three or four times per day by a robot to estimate transpiration (Gosseau et al., 2019). After weighting, the robot watered WW plants to maintain soil water at retention capacity, while WD plants were not watered. When the fraction of transpirable soil water reached 0.1 for a WD plant, a leaf sample was harvested both from this plant and from a WW plant. The harvested leaf was the leaf above the leaf that had reached its maximum size the most recently. Two plants (SF342 inbred line) died during the experiment and could not be harvested.
5 Proteomics
5.1 Protein extraction
Leaf proteins were extracted using the TCA-acetone protocol described in Méchin et al. (2007). Protein digestion was performed according to the liquid digestion protocol described in Hervé et al. (2016). Briefly, proteins of the TCA-acetone pellet were solubilized in a buffer containing urea, thiourea, dithiothreitol, Tris-Hcl pH 8.8 and a zwitterionic acid labile surfactant (ZALSI). Proteins were alkylated by using iodoacetamide and digestion by trypsine was performed after dilution in an ammonium bicarbonate solution. Digestion was stopped by adding trifluoroacetic acid that also allowed ZALS cleavage. The resulting peptide mix was desalted by using C18 solid solid phase extraction. Eluted peptides were then speedVac dried.
LC-MS/MS was performed as described in Duruflé et al. (2017). Peptides (400 ng) were solubilized in a solution containing 2% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid. LC-MS/MS was performed by using an Eksigent nanoLC Ultra 2D nanoHPLC (SCIEX) coupled to a Qexactive mass spectrometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). After desalting on a trapcolumn, peptides were submitted to a gradient of 5 to 35% ACN that was carried out in 40 min. Data-dependent MS analysis was performed with full scans at a 75,000 resolution and MS/MS scans at a 17,500 resolution. The isolation window was set to 3 m/z. MS/MS was repeated for the eight most intense ions detected in full scan and dynamic exclusion was set to 40 s.
5.2 Identification of proteins by LC-MS/MS
Protein identification was made by searching the Heliagen database using genome HanXRQv1 (Badouin et al., 2017) with the X!Tandem search engine (Craig et al., 2004). Data filtering and protein inference were performed by using X!TandemPipeline 3.3.4 (Langella et al., 2017). Trypsin digestion was set with one and five possible miss cleavages in the first and refine pass, respectively. Only proteins identified with at least two different peptides in the same sample were considered (Valot et al., 2011).
5.3 Bioinformatics annotation of proteins and quantification
Quantification by integration of the extracted ion current (XIC) was operated using the MassChroQ software (Valot et al., 2011). Only proteins quantified with at least 2 specific peptides that were present in at least 90% of the samples were selected for analysis. A total of 1211 of the 3062 identified proteins met this criterion. Functional annotation of proteins is given according to the INRAE Sunflower Bioinformatics Resources (www.heliagene.org/HanXRQ-SUNRISE/).
Acknowledgments
These data were produced with the funding of the French National Research Agency (ANR SUNRISE ANR-11-BTBR-0005). This work was part of the “Laboratoire d’Excellence (LABEX)” TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41).
References
- Badouin H, Gouzy J, Grassa CJ, et al. 2017. The sunflower genome provides insights into oil metabolism, flowering and Asterid evolution. Nature 546: 148–152. [Google Scholar]
- Blanchet N, Casadebaig P, Debaeke P, et al. 2018. Data describing the eco-physiological responses of twenty-four sunflower genotypes to water deficit. Data in Brief 21: 1296–1301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Craig R, Cortens JP, Beavis RC. 2004. Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. Journal of Proteome Research 3: 1234–1242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Debaeke P, Bertrand M. 2008. Évaluation des impacts de la sécheresse sur le rendement des grandes cultures en France. Cahiers Agricultures 17: 437–443. [Google Scholar]
- Debaeke P, Casadebaig P, Flenet F, Langlade N. 2017. Sunflower crop and climate change: vulnerability, adaptation, and mitigation potential from case-studies in Europe. OCL 24: D102. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Duruflé H, Clemente HS, Balliau T, Zivy M, Dunand C, Jamet E. 2017. Cell wall proteome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana mature stems. Proteomics 17: 1600449. [Google Scholar]
- Gosseau F, Blanchet N, Varès D, et al. 2019. Heliaphen, an outdoor high-throughput phenotyping platform for genetic studies and crop modeling. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1908. [Google Scholar]
- Hervé V, Duruflé H, San Clemente H, et al. 2016. An enlarged cell wall proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana rosettes. Proteomics 16: 3183–3187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langella O, Valot B, Balliau T, Blein-Nicolas M, Bonhomme L, Zivy M. 2017. X!TandemPipeline: a tool to manage sequence redundancy for protein inference and phosphosite identification. J Proteome Res 16: 494–503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marchand G, Mayjonade B, Varès D, et al. 2013. A biomarker based on gene expression indicates plant water status in controlled and natural environments. Plant, Cell & Environment 36: 2175–2189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Méchin V, Damerval C, Zivy M. 2007. Total protein extraction with TCA-acetone. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.) 355: 1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rengel D, Arribat S, Maury P, et al. 2012. A gene-phenotype network based on genetic variability for drought responses reveals key physiological processes in controlled and natural environments (M. Bendahmane, Ed.). PLoS ONE 7: e45249. [Google Scholar]
- Schneiter AA, Miller JF. 1981. Description of sunflower growth stages. Crop Sciences 21: 901–903. [Google Scholar]
- USDA. 2020. Oilseeds: world markets and trade. [WWW document]. Available from https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf [accessed 3 July 2020]. [Google Scholar]
- Valot B, Langella O, Nano E, Zivy M. 2011. MassChroQ: a versatile tool for mass spectrometry quantification. Proteomics 11: 3572–3577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Balliau T, Duruflé H, Blanchet N, Blein-Nicolas M, Langlade NB, Zivy M. 2021. Proteomic data from leaves of twenty-four sunflower genotypes under water deficit. OCL 28: 12.
All Tables
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.