Table 5
GHG balances and LUC factors for several biodiesel pathways.
|
|||||
(d+i LUC) g eq. CO2/MJ | |||||
|
|||||
ADEME, 2010 | INRA study (De Cara et al., 2012) | ||||
|
|||||
(without LUC | n* | 1st quartile | median | 3rd quartile | |
scenario) | |||||
|
|||||
Rapeseed | 37.3 | 79 | 10 | 54 | 90 |
|
|||||
Sunflower | 25.1 | 10 | 55 | 57 | 59 |
|
|||||
Soy | 21.1 | 64 | 56 | 80 | 168 |
|
|||||
Palm | 21.8 | 52 | 31 | 55 | 120 |
|
|||||
UCOME | 8.7 | ||||
|
|||||
FAME | 8.4 | ||||
|
|||||
PVO | 31.8 | 79 | 10 | 54 | 90 |
|
∗n = number of references by pathway, UCOME : used cook oil methyl ester, FAME: fat animal methyl ester, PVO: pure vegetable oil, GHG balance for diesel (ADEME, 2010) = 91.4 g eq. CO2/MJ (–35% = 59.4, −50% = 45.7).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.