Volume 30, 2023
Innovative Cropping Systems / Systèmes innovants de culture
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 15
Published online 04 August 2023
  • Allard LM. 2021. Guide de culture Cameline – conventionnel et biologique. Terres Inovia, 6 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Andrade JF, Satorre EH. 2015. Single and double crop systems in the Argentine Pampas: Environmental determinants of annual grain yield. Field Crops Res 177: 137–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blesh J. 2018. Functional traits in cover crop mixtures: Biological nitrogen fixation and multifunctionality. J Appl Ecol 55: 38–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonny S. 2010. L’intensification écologique de l’agriculture : voies et défis. In : Coudel E, Devautour H, Soulard CT, Hubert B, eds. ISDA 2010. Montpellier, France : Cirad-Inra-SupAgro. [Google Scholar]
  • Borchers A, Truex-Powell E, Wallander S, Nickerson C. 2014. Multi-cropping practices: Recent trends in double-cropping. United States: EIB-125, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. [Google Scholar]
  • Bowles TM, Mooshammer M, Socolar Y, et al. 2020. Long-term evidence shows that crop-rotation diversification increases agricultural resilience to adverse growing conditions in North America. One Earth 2: 284–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brisson N, Levrault F, eds. 2010. The Green Book of the CLIMATOR project. Climate change, agriculture and forests in France: Simulations of the impacts on the main species. ADEME Editions, 334 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brisson N, Launay M, Mary B, Beaudoin N, eds. 2008. Conceptual basis, formalisations and parameterization of the STICS crop model. Versailles (France): Editions Quae, 297 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Brochier M, Savouré ML, Guy P, Chapron L, Deceuninck A. 2011. Bien choisir sa culture dérobée. Agro-Transfert Ressources et Territoires, 16 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bulan MTS, Stoltenberg DE, Posner JL. 2015. Buckwheat species as summer cover crops for weed suppression in no-tillage vegetable cropping systems. Weed Sci 63: 690–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Callewaert H. 2016. Faisabilité technique et intérêt économique, agronomique et environnemental de cultiver 3 cultures graines en 2 ans. Mémoire d’ingénieur de fin d’études, Institut Polytechnique LaSalle Beauvais, 96 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Caviglia OP, Sadras VO, Andrade FH. 2004. Intensification of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat-soybean. Field Crops Res 87: 117–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Debaeke P, Casadebaig P, Langlade NB. 2021. New challenges for sunflower ideotyping in changing environments and more ecological cropping systems. OCL 28: 29. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Duru M, Therond O, Martin G, et al. 2015. How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 1259–1281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Egli BE, Bruening WP. 2000. Potential of early-maturing soybean cultivars in late plantings. Agron J 92: 532–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrand N. 2018. Étude prospective de la faisabilité technique et de l’intérêt économique, agronomique et environnemental de cultiver trois cultures en deux ans dans le contexte pédoclimatique de Nouvelle-Aquitaine. Mémoire d’ingénieur de fin d’études, AgroCampus Ouest, 82 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Gammans M, Mérel P. 2019. Double cropping as an adaptation to climate change in the United States. In: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, 2019 Annual Meeting, July 21–23, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Gao J, Yang X, Zheng B, et al. 2019. Effects of climate change on the extension of the potential double cropping region and crop water requirements in Northern China. Agric For Meteorol 268: 146–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ghali M, Daniel K, Colson F, Sorin S. 2014. L’agriculture écologiquement intensive. Une approche économique. Économie Rurale 341: 83–99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Graß R, Heuser F, Stülpnagel R, Piepho HP, Wachendorf M. 2013. Energy crop production in double-cropping systems: Results from an experiment at seven sites. Eur J Agron 51: 120–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansel DSS, Schwalbert RA, Shoup DE, et al. 2019. A review of soybean yield when double-cropped after wheat. Agron J 111: 677–685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heaton EA, Schulte LA, Berti M, et al. 2013. Managing a second-generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: Examples from the USA and the EU. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 7: 702–714. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacquin C. 1992. La pratique des doubles cultures. Approche climatique, technique et économique. In : L’irrigation en grandes cultures. Synthèse des acquis et perspectives d’avenir. Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Midi-Pyrénées, 13 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Jouy L, Tournier A. 2011. Ajuster ses pratiques grâce à des indicateurs. Persp Agric 383: 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Kawasaki K. 2019. Two harvests are better than one: Double cropping as a strategy for climate change adaptation. Am J Agric Econ 101: 172–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lamichhane JR, Alletto L, Cong W, et al. 2023. Relay cropping for sustainable intensification of agriculture across temperate regions: Crop management challenges and future research priorities. Field Crops Res 291: 108795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Gall C, Lecomte V, Wagner D. 2022. Oilseed and protein crops grown in French organic farms: An overview of cultivation practices for sunflower and soybean. OCL 29: 4. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecomte V. 2009. Tournesol et soja : réussir une culture dérobée. Persp Agric 357: 93–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Lithourgidis AS, Dordas CA, Damalas CA, Vlachostergios DN. 2011. Annual intercrops: An alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Aust J Crop Sci 5: 396–410. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu R, Wells MS, Garcia y Garcia A. 2020. Relay and sequential cropping corn with winter oilseed crops in northern climates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 116: 195–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mestries E, Desanlis M, Seassau C, Moinard J, Debaeke P, Dechamp-Guillaume G. 2011. Impact de la conduite de culture sur les maladies du tournesol. Innovations agronomiques (INRAE) 14: 91–108. [Google Scholar]
  • Morand N, Chambalier C, Tendrille R, et al. 2013. Guide cultures dérobées fourragères. Chambre d’Agriculture du Puy-de-Dôme, 14 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Page ER, Meloch S, Larsen J. 2019. Evaluating the potential for double cropping in Canada: Effect of seeding date and relative maturity on the development and yield of maize, white bean, and soybean. Can J Plant Sci 99: 751–760. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Plaza-Bonilla D, Nolot JM, Raffaillac D, Justes E. 2015. Cover crops mitigate nitrate leaching in cropping systems including grain legumes: Field evidence and model simulations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 212: 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reddy BN, Suresh G. 2009. Crop diversification with oilseed crops for maximizing productivity, profitability and resource conservation. Ind J Agron 54: 206–214. [Google Scholar]
  • Schipanski ME, Barbercheck M, Douglas MR, et al. 2014. A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems. Agric Syst 125: 12–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schnitkey G. 2018. Revised 2018 corn and soybean budgets. Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign. Farmdoc Daily (8): 24. [Google Scholar]
  • Schoving C, Champolivier L, Maury P, Debaeke P. 2022. Combining multi-environment trials and crop simulation to evaluate the potential of early plantings of soybean crop in southern France. Eur J Agron 133: 126439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Seifert CA, Lobell DB. 2015. Response of double cropping suitability to climate change in the United States. Environ Res Lett 10: 024002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shapiro BI, Brorsen BW, Doster DH. 1992. Adoption of double-cropping soybeans and wheat. J Agric Appl Econ 24: 33–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simon-Miquel G, Reckling M, Lampurlanes J, Plaza-Bonilla D. 2023. A win-win situation – Increasing protein production and reducing synthetic N fertilizer use by integrating soybean into irrigated Mediterranean cropping systems. Eur J Agron 146: 126817. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Steduto P, Hsiao T, Fereres E, Raes D. 2012. Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 66. Roma: FAO, 500 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Tanveer M, Anjum SA, Hussain S, Cerdà A, Ashraf U. 2017. Relay cropping as a sustainable approach: Problems and opportunities for sustainable crop production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24: 6973–6988. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tittonell P. 2014. Ecological intensification of agriculture – Sustainable by nature. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 8: 53–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vlachostergios DN, Noulas C, Baxevanos D, et al. 2021. Response of early maturity soybean cultivars to row spacing in full-season crop and double-crop systems. Plant Soil Environ 67: 18–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang J, Wang E, Yang X, Zhang F, Yin H. 2012. Increased yield potential of wheat-maize cropping system in the North China Plain by climate change adaptation. Clim Change 113: 825–840. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wauters VM, Grossman JM, Pfeiffer A, Cala R. 2021. Ecosystem services and cash crop tradeoffs of summer cover crops in northern region organic vegetable rotations. Front Sustain Food Syst 5: 635955. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu J, Gao J, de Holanda HV, et al. 2021. Double cropping and cropland expansion boost grain production in Brazil. Nat Food 2: 264–273. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yamane K, Ikoma A, Iijima M. 2016. Performance of double cropping and relay intercropping for black soybean production in small-scale farms. Plant Prod Sci 19: 449–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang L, Spiertz JHJ, Zhang S, Li B, van der Werf W. 2008. Nitrogen economy in relay intercropping systems of wheat and cotton. Plant Soil 303: 55–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.