EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 23 / No 6 (November-December 2016) OCL, 23 6 (2016) D609 References
Open Access
Issue
OCL
Volume 23, Number 6, November-December 2016
Article Number D609
Number of page(s) 11
Section Dossier: Oil crops and supply chain in Asia / La filière oléagineuse en Asie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2016042
Published online 08 November 2016
  • Agricultural products and foodstuffs – PDO and PGI - Reg. (EC) No. 510/2006, Oils and fats, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/schemes/index_en.htm [Google Scholar]
  • Aprile MC, Caputo V, Nayga Jr, RM. 2012. Consumers’ valuation of food quality labels: the case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels. Int J Consumer Studies 36: 158–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arete. 2013. Study on assessing the added value of PDO/PGI products, Executive Summary, Commissioned Study by the European Commission, December. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/external-studies/addedvalue-pdo-pgi_en.htm [Google Scholar]
  • Barham E. 2003. Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. J. Rur. Stud. 19: 127–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Belletti G, Brazzini A, Marescotti A. 2014. Collective rules and the use of protected geographical indications by firms. Prologue. The role of localised agrifood systems in a globalised Europe 7, 11. [Google Scholar]
  • Bessou C, Chase L, Henson I, et al. 2012. PalmGHG, the RSPO greenhouse gas calculator for oil palm products. In 8th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-Food Sector, pp. 498-504. http://hal.cirad.fr/cirad-00771650/. [Google Scholar]
  • Biénabe E, Marie-Vivien D. 2015. Institutionalizing geographical indications in southern countries: lessons learned from Basmati and Rooibos. World Development. In press: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.04.004. [Google Scholar]
  • Brandi C, Cabani T, Hosang C, Schirmbeck S, Westermann L, Wiese H. 2015. Sustainability Standards for Palm Oil Challenges for Smallholder Certification Under the RSPO. J. Environment & Development 24: 292–314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brunelle T, Dumas P, Souty F. 2014. The impact of globalization on food and agriculture: The case of the diet convergence. J. Environment & Development 23: 41–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crowder DW, Reganold JP. 2015. Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. 112: 7611–7616. [Google Scholar]
  • Daviron B, Vagneron I. 2011. From Commoditisation to De-commoditisation...and Back Again: Discussing the Role of Sustainability Standards for Agricultural Products. Development Policy Review 29: 91–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van Duijn G. 2013. Traceability of the palm oil supply chain. Lipid Technology 25: 15–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Durand C, Fournier S. 2015. Can Geographical Indications Modernize Indonesian and Vietnamese Agriculture? Analyzing the Role of National and Local Governments and Producers’ Strategies. World Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.022. [Google Scholar]
  • Efeca UK. 2016. Comparison of the ISPO, MSPO and RSPO Standards. http://www.sustainablepalmoil.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/09/Efeca_PO-Standards-Comparison.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Gereffi G, Lee J. 2012. Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management 48: 24–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harsono D, Chozin, MA,Fauzi AM. 2012. Analysis on Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO): A Qualitative Assessment the Success Factors for ISPO. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis 9: 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Inglis D, Gimlin D. 2015. The globalization of food. Nova York. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivancic H, Koh LP. 2016. Evolution of sustainable palm oil policy in Southeast Asia. Cogent Environmental Science 2: 1195032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lacoste F. 2014. Undesirable substances in vegetable oils: anything to declare? OCL 21: A103. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Laurence W-F, et al. 2010. Improving the performance of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil for Nature Conservation. Conservation Biology 24: 1523–1739. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee J, Gereffi G, Beauvais J. 2012. Global value chains and agrifood standards: Challenges and possibilities for smallholders in developing countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 12326–12331 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Linnemer L, Perrot A. 2000. Une analyse économique des signes de qualité : labels et certification des produits. Revue Economique 51: 1397–1418. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno-Peñaranda R, et al. 2015. Sustainable production and consumption of palm oil in Indonesia: What can stakeholder perceptions offer to the debate? Sustainable Production and Consumption 4: 16–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rival A, Levang P. 2014. Palms of controversies: Oil palm and development challenges. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruysschaert D, Salles D. 2014. Towards global voluntary standards: Questioning the effectiveness in attaining conservation goals: The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). Ecological Economics 107: 438–446. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruysschaert D, Salles D. 2016. The strategies and effectiveness of conservation ngos in the global voluntary standards: The case of the roundtable on sustainable palm-oil. Conservation and Society 14: 73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sustainable Palm Oil Transparency Toolkit (SPOTT). 2016. Standards and Certification, ZSL. [Google Scholar]
  • Sylvander B, Lagrange L, Monticelli C. 2007. Official Quality Signs in France and Europe. Which Place in a Globalized Economy, Économie rurale 299: 7–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vijay V, Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Smith SJ. 2016. The Impacts of Oil Palm on Recent Deforestation and Biodiversity Loss. PLoS One 11: e0159668. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao X, Finlay D, Kneafsey M. 2014. The effectiveness of contemporary Geographical Indications (GIs) schemes in enhancing the quality of Chinese agrifoods – Experiences from the field. J. Rur. Stud. 36: 77–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.