Open Access
Issue
OCL
Volume 22, Number 4, July-August 2015
Article Number D403
Number of page(s) 6
Section Dossier: 12th Euro Fed Lipids Congress: Oils, Fats and Lipids: From Lipidomics to Industrial Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2015004
Published online 01 May 2015

© T. Bardeau et al., Published by EDP Sciences 2015

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1 Introduction

Oil demand is in constant increase for years due to nutritional and industrial issues. For nutritional aspects, recommendations concerning the omega 3/omega 6 balance are responsible for new developments in specialty oils and for a global increase of the oil volume demand. In the same time, the use of oil for biodiesel production is also increasing. By still containing 10 to 30% of oil, press cakes are valuable sources of oils that, by regards of environmental and human health concerns, could be recovered by eco-efficient processes. So far, large scale oil facilities process is based on a pressing step followed by a solvent extraction using hexane to exhaust the cake (Fine, 2013). As an alternative and eco-efficient approach, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) can be envisaged.

Table 1

Press cake compositions (different letters are for statistically different lipid content (Tukey HSD test at 95% confidence interval)).

The recovery of oil from oilseeds by SFE is a solid-fluid extraction process that uses mostly carbon dioxide as extracting fluid. Indeed, oil solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) is relatively high (0.1 to 200 g oil/kg CO2) depending on the fluid density (i.e. pressure and temperature) (del Valle et al., 2012). ScCO2 is an apolar fluid so ethanol is often used as a cosolvent to modify its polarity and to favor co-extraction of more polar compounds. SFE of oilseeds has been extensively studied on various matrices over the past decades (Eggers, 1996). However, SFE applied on press cakes is more confidential and the consequences of pressing on SFE performances still have to be evaluated.

In this work, SFE was investigated as a technique to recover residual edible oils from various press cakes presenting different fatty acid profiles. Hempseed oil is a linoleic oil, typically composed of 56% of linoleic acid (18:2 n-6), 22% of α-linolenic acid (18:3 n-3), and 9% of oleic acid (18:1) (Callaway, 2004). Walnut oil can be classified in the same category with 56–65% of 18:2, 14–21% of 18:1, 9–15% of 18:3 and 6–8% of palmitic acid (16:0) (Morin, 1996a). Poppy seed oil is also a linoleic oil with 69–77% of 18:2, 13–18% of 18:1, 9–11% of 16:0 and less than 3.5% of other fatty acids (Morin, 1996b). Linseed oil (also call flaxseed oil) is a linolenic oil and is typically composed of 59% of 18:3, 15% of 18:2, 18% of 18:1 other fatty acids accounting for less than 10% of the total fatty acids (Przybylski, 2005). Sesame oil is an oleic-linoleic oil containing 39–47% of 18:2, 37–42% of 18:1, 8–11% of 16:0 and 4–6% of stearic acid (18:0) (Morin, 1996b). These seeds present different fatty acid profiles but have in common a high degree of unsaturation.

Supercritical extraction has already been investigated for these five seeds and nut, and the studies generally focused on the effect of process parameters (namely pressure, temperature and flow rate) on extraction yield (on sesame (Corso et al., 2010; Döker et al., 2010); on hemp (Da Porto et al., 2012a, 2012b); on poppy (Bozan and Temelli, 2003); on walnut (Oliveira et al., 2002; Salgin and Salgin, 2006)). For instance, on linseed, SFE optimization (Bozan and Temelli, 2002; Ivanov, 2012; Jiao, 2008; Özkal, 2009; Rombaut, 2013) showed that an increase of temperature and pressure increased the oil yield. Depending on extraction conditions, up to 82% of oil could be extracted with neat CO2. In Ivanov’s work (2012), ethanol was used as cosolvent, but it was directly added to the load prior to CO2 extraction. The higher the quantity of ethanol, the higher was the oil yield (up to 99%). Whilst SFE is mainly investigated on raw seeds, SFE on press cake is more rarely reported. Dealing with walnut press cake, Martinez et al. (2008) recovered the oil with yield higher than 90% for SFE carried out at 40 MPa and temperatures higher than 50 °C.

The oil quality is generally assessed by calorimetry, peroxide value (for oxidative status characterization) or absorbance at specific wavelengths (for minor compound determination). Whatever the seeds, the oil recovered by supercritical technology was generally of a lower quality than cold pressed oils. For example, Martinez et al. (2008) first pressed walnuts and then performed SFE on the press cake. The two oils produced were analyzed by same methods. SFE oils presented higher acid value (0.4% oleic acid vs. 0.1% for cold press oils) and lower oxidative stability (0.3 to 0.8 h vs. 3 h for cold press oils; measured with the Rancimat method). So SFE oils were more degraded and less stable than cold pressing oils. However, SFE oils contained higher amounts of carotenoids (9 μg/g of oil vs. 2 μg/g for cold press oil).

The aim of this study was to evaluate SFE performance at recovering residual oil when applied to five press cakes that exhibited different lipid contents and matrix characteristics. The process efficiency was evaluated in terms of oil yield and oil characteristics.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Experimental SFE setup.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Raw material

Press cakes were supplied by Bioplanète (Bram, France). Cakes came from organic seeds of poppy (Papaver somniferum L. var. nigrum), linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.), hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) and sesame (Sesamum indicum). Walnut (Juglans regia) cake was also used. The characteristics of cakes are given in Table 1.

Total lipid content was determined by chloroform/methanol extraction according to Folch method (Folch, 1957). Water content was assessed using a thermobalance (Sartorius) at 105 °C until mass variation became lower than 1 mg. Other characteristics were given by the supplier.

2.2 Supercritical fluid extraction

The scheme of the set-up is provided in Figure 1. The equipment is mainly composed of a 0.49 L cylindrical vessel fed by two high pressure pumps (Gilson). Liquid CO2 (Air Liquide, France) was first cooled to –0.3 °C before the pump then heated to 45 °C by an electrical heater before being introduced in the vessel. The vessel that contained the matrix was thermally controlled by an electrical mantle.

Supercritical fluid extraction was carried out at 45 °C and 25 MPa using CO2 (~15 g min-1) and ethanol (~7 %wt) as co-solvent. The vessel was first loaded with 35 g of milled press cake then heated to 45 °C. Pure CO2 was introduced until a pressure of 25 MPa and the vessel was isolated at this pressure for 35 min. The two pumps were then activated and the CO2 + 7% wt ethanol mixture flew through the matrix bed. Extracts were collected at atmospheric pressure after the fluid depressurization. The first two fractions, called F0 and F1, were each collected after 60 min of flow. After these 120 min, extraction was continued with 27% wt ethanol to exhaust the cake in more polar lipids. At the end, pure CO2 flew over the matrix bed for one hour to remove ethanol. In this work we focused on the oily phase, so only the F0 fraction was characterized.

2.3 Extract characterization

Collected extracts were centrifuged for phase separation. Each phase was then weighted and its volume measured. Ethanol was evaporated under a flux of nitrogen for mass balance assessment. The lipid content of the extracted matrix (hereafter called residue) was determined by the Folch method as well (Folch, 1957).

Extraction yield was calculated as the global extracted mass divided by press cake amount introduced in the SFE vessel. Lipid extraction yield was expressed as the ratio of the mass of total lipid extracted (calculated by difference between press cake lipid content and residue lipid content) to the lipid mass in the press cake. Oil yield was calculated as the ratio of free oil recovered from the oily phase to the total lipid mass of press cake.

Fatty acid profiles were determined by gas chromatography (GC) analysis after transesterification. Total lipid fractions were transmethylated in presence of boron trifluoride-methanol complex (Morisson, 1964). Fatty acid methyl esters were separated on a BPX 70 capillary column (60 m long, 0.25 μm film, 0.25 mm i.d., SGE (Melbourne, Australia)), using hydrogen as carrier gas and a split ratio between 1:50 and 1:60. The GC system consisted in a gas chromatograph (GC 2010 plus, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a flame ionization detector maintained at 280 °C. The injector was at 250 °C. The column temperature was programmed from 150 °C to 200 °C (1.3 °C/min) held for 30 min, then from 200 °C to 250 °C (20 °C/min) held for 30 min. Data was collected and integrated by a GC solution v2.4 integration system (Shimadzu). Fatty acids from Sigma were used as standards for calibration.

Absorbance and spectra (300–900 nm) of oily phases were recorded on Hitachi U2800 spectrometer after dilution with hexane and using quartz cells. The carotenoid content was determined as fi-carotene equivalent from absorbance at 453 nm using fi-carotene diluted in groundnut oil for calibration (0–5 mg/kg) (Lichtenthaler, 2001).

Oxidative status of the oily phases was assessed by peroxide value determination (ISO3960 adapted method).

thumbnail Fig. 2

Extraction kinetic.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Extraction kinetic

The overall extraction kinetic of the five cakes is given in Figure 2. The first part of the curve, up to 2 kg of fluid, corresponded to F0 and F1 fractions recovered using CO2 + 7% ethanol. Most of the extracted amount came from F0 since F1 contributed only for few milligrams. This F0 fraction represented 65 to 67% of the total extract for all press cakes except hemp for which it represented 80%. The extraction kinetics exhibited then a second increase after 2 kg of fluid that corresponded to the increase of ethanol to 27 %wt. This higher content of ethanol allowed for extracting more polar lipids like for instance phospholipids and ensured thus that the extraction is effective for all classes of lipids (Catchpole et al., 2009).

thumbnail Fig. 3

Extracted masses.

3.2 Extraction efficiency

The total extracted mass was highly dependent on the raw material nature and varied from 3.6 g for walnut to 8.2 g for sesame (Fig. 3). The mass could be correlated to the initial lipid content of the press cake (Tab. 1). As observed when comparing sesame and walnut, the higher the lipid content, the higher was the extracted mass. Hemp, linseed and walnut, that are similar in terms of lipid contents (8 to 11%), resulted in intermediate and similar extracted amounts. Only poppy showed a different behavior with an extracted mass fifty percent higher than hemp despite similar lipid content. For the five press cakes, the extracted material was mainly composed of lipids, in a content that varied from 50 to 97%. Hemp, linseed and sesame extracts contained more than 85% of lipids whereas extracts were composed of 52 and 60% of lipids for poppy and walnut, respectively.

Walnut exhibited a different behavior that could be due to a different cell structure owing to the matrix nature (walnut is not an oleaginous seed but a nut) (Morin, 1996b). Poppy’s behavior was also quite surprising but its particular behavior could not be related to a particular chemical composition of the oil or the structure of the seed.

Excepted for poppy, all F0 fractions were biphasic with an oily phase at bottom and an ethanolic supernatant on top of it. The biphasic nature of F0 could be explained by the low solubility of vegetable oil in ethanol at ambient temperature (Johnson and Lusas, 1983). Supercritical CO2 is a very good solvent of triglycerides (Sahena et al., 2009) so neutral lipids were indeed extracted. But, after decompression, when the fluid mixture splits in gaseous CO2 and liquid ethanol, the collected volume of ethanol was not high enough to dissolve the oil so a biphasic extract was recovered. With again exception of poppy, more than half of the extracted lipids were recovered as a separate oily phase. The mass of this oil was highly dependent of the raw material and was well correlated to the press cake initial lipid content. For poppy, only 7% of extracted lipids were in a separate phase that was, moreover, solid at ambient temperature.

The efficiency of an extraction process is classically evaluated by yields. Here, three yields have been defined corresponding to the three levels of extract characteristics. The global extraction yield is the total extracted mass divided by the press cake amount; the lipid extraction yield is the mass of extracted lipids divided by the mass of lipids in the loaded press cake whereas the oil yield only considers the oily phase divided by the initial amount of lipids in the loaded press cake.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Extraction yields.

The global extraction yields were comprised between 10 and 23% (Fig. 4), the highest values being for sesame and poppy (23 and 19%, respectively) and the lowest for walnut (10%). The lipid extraction yield indicates the performance of the technique to remove the initial amounts of lipids in cakes. Lipid extraction yields were relatively high varying from 98 to 76% for hemp and walnut, respectively. Linseed, poppy and sesame exhibited lipid yield in the range of 87–92%. These yields were higher than the majority of those reported for lipid extraction by neat CO2 from same seeds (Bozan and Temelli, 2002, 2003; Corso et al., 2010; Da Porto et al., 2012a, 2012b). However, on walnut press cake, Martinez et al. (2008) obtained an oil yield of 92% that is higher than the 76% obtained herein.

Regarding specifically the oil phase, yields were in the same range for hemp, sesame and walnut press cakes (~56%) and in lesser extend for linseed (45%), but it was far smaller for poppy (7%). As already mentioned, the F0 poppy fraction was really different from the other F0 since lipids did not form a separate oily phase.

Table 2

Fatty acid profiles, and minor compounds composition.

3.3 Composition of F0 fraction

F0 fractions were characterized in terms of fatty acid profile and peroxide values for the oily phase, whereas the carotenoids were quantified on both the oily and the ethanol phases. Results of characterization are overviewed in Table 2.

Regarding the fatty acid profile, the oils obtained by SFE have almost the same fatty acid composition than the raw materials. This absence of selectivity of SFE towards specific triglycerides as measured by the fatty acid composition was also observed in literature on various raw materials (Da Porto et al., 2012a; Martinez et al., 2008). Peroxide value determination was performed on all F0 oily fractions except for poppy whose oily fraction was solid and of too low volume to allow measurements. The oil peroxide values were highly affected by press cake species. Depending on the raw material, peroxide value was below or above the limit fixed by the codex alimentarius (Codex Alimentarius, 1981). On that basis, only oils produced from linseed and walnut press cakes were of alimentary grade.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Absorption spectra (for hemp, spectrum is divided by 25).

Carotenoids were quantified by spectrophotometry (Fig. 5). In oily phases, carotenoids ranged between 0 and 231 mg/kg oil, and the content was highly dependent on the raw material. The hemp extract exhibited content more than tenth time higher than the other press cake extracts. This high value could be due to carotenoids but it could also came from the presence of chlorophylls that interfered in the quantitation. Presence of chlorophylls was evidenced both by the strong green color of F0 and by the absorbance spectrum (Fig. 5). Although chlorophylls absorb at higher wavelengths than carotenoids (600–650 nm instead of 400–500 nm), their residual absorbance at 453 nm will contribute to the carotenoid content as well. Hemp oil is not specially known for high chlorophyll content. According to Matthäus and Brühl, 2008, chlorophylls might sign immature pressed seeds. Indeed, the chlorophyll content of seeds decreases with maturity and fully mature seed are usually devoid of chlorophyll. Chlorophylls are lipophilic molecules, so if they are still present in seeds they will be recovered with oil. Regarding carotenoids in the ethanol supernatant, the content ranged from 1 to 45 mg/kg dry extract, with exception of the 1810 mg/kg for hemp. Whatever the cake, carotenoid content of ethanolic phases was higher than that of the oil.

4 Conclusions

In this work, valorization of food industry by-products has been studied through the recovery of lipids from press cakes. SFE with ethanol as co-solvent allowed the recovery of 75 to 98% of the lipids and was highly influenced by the raw material nature. Although the process used ethanol, the oil phase could be easily separated from the supernatant by decantation. The fatty acid profile of the oil was not affected by the extraction process. Hence, the proposed process could be of interest for efficient de-oiling of press cakes. Moreover, carotenoids and chlorophylls were extracted depending on their presence in the raw material. Although these compounds distributed in both oil and ethanol phases, their extraction showed that pigment-enriched oils could be produced by the process. About economic aspects of SFE, recent studies have highlighted the interest of such a technology for natural product extraction. The investment costs are not notably higher than those of classical extraction plants (Perrut, 2000) and the cost of manufacturing are often highly dependent from raw material cost (Pereira, 2010). In fat and oil transformation, SFE is gaining more and more interest over the years (Temelli, 2009). To conclude on economic viability of press cake CO2 extraction, a cost analysis should be considered in the future.

Acknowledgments

The financial support of French ANR Project ANR-12-BS09-0006-01 (2012–2015) is greatly acknowledged.

References

  • Bozan B, Temelli F. 2002. Supercritical CO2 extraction of flaxseed. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 79: 231–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bozan B, Temelli F. 2003. Extraction of poppy seed oil using supercritical CO2. J. Food Sci. 68: 422–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Callaway JC. 2004. Hempseed as a nutritional resource: An overview. Euphytica 140: 65–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Catchpole OJ, Tallon SJ, Eltringham WE, et al. 2009. The extraction and fractionation of specialty lipids using near critical fluids. J. Supercrit Fluids 47: 591–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Codex Alimentarius. 1981. Codex Stan 19-1981 – codex standard for edible oils and fats not covered by individual standards, p. 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Corso MP, Fagundes-Klen MR, Silva EA, et al. 2010. Extraction of sesame seed (Sesamun indicum L.) oil using compressed propane and supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 52: 56–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Da Porto C, Decorti D, Tubaro F. 2012a. Fatty acid composition and oxidation stability of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seed oil extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide. Ind. Crops Prod. 36: 401–404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Da Porto C, Voinovich D, Decorti D, Natolino A. 2012b. Response surface optimization of hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) oil yield and oxidation stability by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. J. Supercrit. Fluids 68: 45–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Döker O, Salgin U, Yildiz N, Aydoǧmuş M, Çalimli A. 2010. Extraction of sesame seed oil using supercritical CO2 and mathematical modeling. J. Food Eng. 97: 360–366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Del Valle JM, de la Fuente JC, Uquiche E. 2012. A refined equation for predicting the solubility of vegetable oils in high pressure CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 67: 60–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eggers R. 1996. Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) of oilseeds/lipids in natural products. In: King JW, List GR, Eds. Supercritical fluid technology in oil and lipid chemistry, Champaign (USA): AOCS Press, pp. 35–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Fine F, Albert-Vian M, Fabiano-Tixier AS, Carre P, Pages X, Chemat F. 2013. Les agro-solvants pour l’extraction des huiles végétales issues de graines oléagineuses. OCL, 20: A502. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley H. 1957. A simple method fort he isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226: 497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ivanov DS, Colovic RR. Levic JD. Sredanovic SA. 2012. Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of linseed oil using RSM. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 114: 807–815. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiao SS, Li D, Huang ZG, et al. 2008. Optimization of supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of flaxseed oil Using response surface methodology. Int. J. Food Eng. 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson LA, Lusas EW. 1983. Comparison of alternative solvents for oils extraction. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 60: 229–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lichtenthaler HK, Buschman C. 2001. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Measurement and Characterization by UV-VIS Spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry F:F4:F4.3. [Google Scholar]
  • Martínez ML, Mattea MA, Maestri DM. 2008. Pressing and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of walnut oil. J. Food Eng. 88: 399–404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matthäus B, Brühl L. 2008. Virgin Hemp Seed Oil: An Interesting Niche Product. Eur. J. Lip. Sci. Tech. 110: 655–661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morin O. Safflower, sesame, camelina, poppy seed oil. In: Karleskind A, Ed. Oils and fats manual, vol. 1. Paris (France): Lavoisier Publishing, 1996a, pp. 148–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Morin O. Almond, hazelnut, walnut. In: Karleskind A, Ed. Oils and fats manual, vol. 1. Paris (France): Lavoisier Publishing, 1996b, pp. 148–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Morrison WR, Smith LM. 1964. Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters and dimethylacetals from lipids with boron fluoride–methanol. J. Lipid. Res. 5: 600–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliveira R, Rodrigues MF, Bernardo-Gil MG. 2002. Characterization and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of walnut oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 79: 225–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Özkal SG. 2009. Response surface analysis and modeling of flaxseed oil yield in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 86: 1129–1135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira CG, Meireles MAA. 2010. Supercritical fluid extraction of bioactive compounds: Fundamentals, applications and economic perspectives. Food Bioprocess Tech. 3: 340–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Perrut M. 2000. Supercritical Fluid Applications: Industrial Developments and Economic Issues. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39: 4531–4535 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Przybylski R. Flax oil and high linolenic oils. In: Shahidi F, Ed. Bailey’s industrial oil and fat products, vol. 2, 6th ed. Hoboken (USA): John Wiley & Sons, 2005, pp. 281–297. [Google Scholar]
  • Rombaut N. 2013. Étude comparative de trois procédés d’extraction d’huile: aspects qualitatifs et quantitatifs. Application aux graines de lin et aux pépins de raisin. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Technologie de Compiègne (France), 255 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sahena F, Zaidul ISM, Jinap S, et al. 2009. Application of supercritical CO2 in lipid extraction – A review. J. Food Eng. 95: 240–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Salgın S, Salgın U. 2006. Supercritical fluid extraction of walnut kernel oil. Eur. J. Lip. Sci. Tech. 108: 577–582. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Temelli F. 2009. Perspectives on supercritical fluid processing of fats and oils. J. Supercrit. Fluids 47: 583–590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Tiphaine Bardeau, Raphaelle Savoire, Maud Cansell, Pascale Subra-Paternault. Recovery of oils from press cakes by CO2-based technology. OCL 2015, 22(4) D403.

All Tables

Table 1

Press cake compositions (different letters are for statistically different lipid content (Tukey HSD test at 95% confidence interval)).

Table 2

Fatty acid profiles, and minor compounds composition.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Experimental SFE setup.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Extraction kinetic.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Extracted masses.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Extraction yields.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Absorption spectra (for hemp, spectrum is divided by 25).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.