Open Access
Review
Table 1
Summary of strategies for increasing lipid accumulation in Y. lipolytica. The symbol Δ represents a gene knockout and gene expression is represented by all uppercase letters.
Carbon source | Scale | Y. lipolytica strain | Modification | Lipid content % (grams of lipids per gram dry weight) |
Lipid titer g/L (grams of lipids per liter of culture) |
Lipid yield g/g (grams of lipid per gram of carbon substrate consumed) |
Productivity g/L/h (grams per lipid per liter of culture per hour) |
References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1f | Δmfe1, Δpex10, DGA1 | 71.0 | 25.30 | – | 0.210 | (Blazeck et al., 2014) |
Glucose | Flask | Po1g | DGA2 | – | 2.4 | 0.55 | – | (Silverman et al., 2016) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | JMY3501 | GPD1, DGA2 | 55.0 | – | 0.140 | – | (Sagnak et al., 2018) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1g | hp4d-ACC1, TEFin-DGA1 | 61.7 | – | 0.195 | 0.143 | (Tai and Stephanopoulos, 2013) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1g | TEFin-ACC1, TEFin-DGA1, TEFin-SCD | – | 55.00 | 0.234 | 0.707 | (Qiao et al., 2015) |
Glycerol | Flask | Po1d | Δgsy1 | 52.0 | – | – | – | (Bhutada et al., 2017) |
Glucose | Flask | Po1g | Hp4d-LRO1 | 12.0 | 1.30 | – | – | (Amalia et al., 2020) |
Glucose | Flask | ATCC 20362 | Δsnf1 | 30.0 | – | – | – | (Seip et al., 2013) |
Glycerol | Bioreactor | H222 | Δsnf1, DGA1, DGA2 | 53.0 | 4.80 | – | 0.070 | (Abghari and Chen, 2017) |
Glucose | Flask | ACA-DC 50109 | Δmig1 | 48.7 | – | – | – | (Wang et al., 2013) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1f | EMS mutagenesis | 87.0 | 38.9 | 0.243 | 0.509 | (Liu et al., 2015a, b) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1f | Δmga2 | – | 25.00 | 0.213 | 0.145 | (Liu et al., 2015b) |
Glucose | Flask | ACA-DC 50109 | Δmhy1 | 43.1 | – | – | – | (Wang et al., 2018) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1f | ACC1, DGA1, SCD, Δpex10, Δmfe1, Δ-12D, Δ-15D (flax) | 77.8 | 50.00 | – | – | (Yan et al., 2020) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | NS18 | DGA1 (from Rhodosporidium toruloides), DGA2 (from Claviceps purpurea), Δtgl3 | 77.0 | 85.00 | 0.210 | 0.730 | (Friedlander et al., 2016) |
Glycerol | Flask | Po1h | ACL (from mus musculus) | 23.1 | – | – | – | (Zhang et al., 2014) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1h | Haemoglobin (from Vitreoscilla) | 14.5 | – | – | – | (Zhang et al., 2019a) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1g | perCAT2 (from S. cerevisiae), ACC1, DGA1 | – | 66.40 | 0.229 | 0.565 | (Xua et al., 2016) |
Xylose | Bioreactor | Po1d | DGA2, GPD1, XDH, XR, XK, XPKA (from Aspergillus nidulans), ACK (from Aspergillus nidulans), Δpox1-6, Δtgl4 | 67.0 | 16.50 | – | 1.850 | (Niehus et al., 2018) |
Glucose/xylose | Bioreactor | Po1f | XK, DGA1, Δpex10 | 56.7 | 13.50 | – | – | (Yook et al., 2020) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1g | ACC1, DGA1, MCE2 (from Mucor circinelloide), GAPC (from Clostridium acetobutylicum) | 66.70 | 99.3 | 0.279 | 1.200 | (Qiao et al., 2017) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | Po1g | GSR ylGPO ScZwf EcALDH |
82.5 | 72.70 | 0.252 | 0.970 | (Xu et al., 2017) |
Crude glycerol | Flask | TISTR 5151 | – | 64.0 | – | – | – | (Cheirsilp and Louhasakul, 2013) |
Crude glycerol | Flask | A101 | – | 25.0 | 1.69 | – | – | (Dobrowolski et al., 2016) |
Crude glycerol | Flask | QU21 | – | 18.9 | 1.27 | 0.060 | – | (Poli et al., 2014) |
Crude glycerol | Bioreactor | SKY7 | – | 7.21 | (Kumar et al., 2020) | |||
Purified glycerol | Purification of crude glycerol using phosphoric acid | 19.47 | ||||||
Crude glycerol | Flask | SM7 | Addition of olive oil | 35.80 | 6.13 | – | – | (Magdouli et al., 2017) |
Palm oil mill effluent | Flask | TISTR 5151 | Addition of surfactant | – | 2.54 | – | – | (Louhasakul et al., 2020) |
Acetic acid | Flask | CICC 31596 | – | 31.12 | 0.724 | 0.290 | – | (Gao et al., 2017) |
Acetic acid | Flask | CICC 31596 | Maintain an alkaline pH | 27.22 | 10.11 | 0.144 | – | (Gao et al., 2020) |
Glucose | Culture tubes | Po1f | Using urea as a nitrogen source | – | 0.65 | – | – | (Brabender et al., 2018) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | ACA-DC50109 | Double nitrogen and magnesium limitation | 47.5 | 5.80 | – | – | (Bellou et al., 2016) |
Crude glycerol | Bioreactor | SKY7 | pH controlled at 6.5 | 45.4 | 7.78 | – | – | (Kuttiraja et al., 2018) |
Glycerol | Flask | W 29 | pH 5.5 | 63.0 | – | 0.023 | – | (Sekova et al., 2019) |
Glucose | Flask | ATCC 20460 | Increase in OTR factor | ≈50 | – | – | – | (Lopes et al., 2018) |
Glucose | Bioreactor | H222 | Drop of oxygen concentration from 50% to 1% after 20 h cultivation | – | – | 0.110 | – | (Kavšcek et al., 2015) |
Glycerol | Bioreactor | SM7 | Two-stage cultivation with a dissolved oxygen shift from 60% to 30% | 52.7 | 13.60 | – | – | (Sara et al., 2016) |
Glucose and acetic acid | Bioreactor | MUCL 28849 | Two-stage fed-batch fermentation | 40.7 | 12.36 | 0.130 | 0.160 | (Fontanille et al., 2012) |
Pretreated cane molasses | Bioreactor | S47 | Two-stage fed-batch fermentation | 57.3 | 12.20 | – | – | (Wang et al., 2019) |
Glycerol | Bioreactor | LGAM S(7)1 | Continuous fermentation | 43.0 | – | – | 1.200 | (Papanikolaou and Aggelis, 2002) |
Glycerol | Chemostat | JMY4086 | Continuous fermentation | – | 24.20 | 0.100 | 0.430 | (Rakicka et al., 2015) |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.