EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 29 (2022) OCL, 29 (2022) 12 References
Open Access
Issue
OCL
Volume 29, 2022
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 10
Section Agronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2022006
Published online 22 February 2022
  • Ávila-Diazgranados R, Daza E, Navia E, Romero H. 2016. Response of various oil palm materials (Elaeis guineensis and Elaeis oleifera × Elaeis guineensis interspecific hybrids) to bud rot disease in the southwestern oil palm-growing area of Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana 34: 74–81. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n1.53760. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Camperos JE, Pulido N, Munévar DE, et al. 2020. Estudio de tiempos y movimientos para la polinización artificial: Estudio de caso en una plantación de Santander (Colombia). Palmas 41(3): 11–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Daza E, Ayala-Díaz I, Ruiz-Romero R, Romero HM. 2020. Effect of the application of plant hormones on the formation of parthenocarpic fruits and oil production in oil palm interspecific hybrids (Elaeis oleifera Cortes × Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Plant Production Science: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2020.1862681. [Google Scholar]
  • Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. 1-naphthaleneacetic acid; pesticide tolerances. Federal Register/Vol. 77, No. 89/Tuesday, May 8, 2012/Rules and Regulations. [Google Scholar]
  • Fontanilla C, Rincón V, Mesa E, Mariño D, Barrera E, Mosquera M. 2016. Estimación del rendimiento de la mano de obra en labores de cultivo de palma de aceite: caso polinización asistida. Palmas 37(2): 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  • García A, Ibagué D, Munévar DE, Hernández JS, Mosquera Montoya M. 2020. Polinización artificial: ¿ANA en suspensión líquida o ANA en mezcla sólida? Palmas 41(4): 15–26. [Google Scholar]
  • González-Diaz A, Pataquiva-Mateus A, Garcia-Nunez JA. 2021. Recovery of palm phytonutrients as a potential market for the by-products generated by palm oil mills and refineries ‒ A review. Food Bioscience 41(5): 100916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.100916. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández D, Rodríguez J, Daza E, Lemus L, Mosquera M. 2020. Punto óptimo de cosecha de racimos para híbridos interespecíficos O × G (Coari × La Mé) asperjados con reguladores de crecimiento. Boletín El Palmicultor (580): 16–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez-Bencardino C. 2012. Estadística y muestreo (Décimo tercera ed.). Bogotá: Ecoe Ediciones. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyers F. 2000. Estudio de tiempos y movimientos para la manufactura ágil. Edita Alfa Omega. Segunda edición. México: Ciudad de México. [Google Scholar]
  • Mosquera M, García A. 2005. Estudios de tiempos y movimientos para la agroindustria colombiana de la palma de aceite. Centro de Investigación en Palma de Aceite, Cenipalma (Colombia). Ceniavances (129): 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Mosquera M, López D, Ruiz E, Valderrama M, Castro L. 2019. Mano de obra en cultivos de palma aceitera de Colombia: participación en el costo de producción y demanda. Palmas 40(1): 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Mozzon M, Foligni R, Tylewicz U. 2018. Chemical characteristics and nutritional properties of hybrid palm oils. Palm Oil 149: 149–170. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75421. [Google Scholar]
  • Navia EA, Ávila RA, Daza EE, Restrepo EF, Romero HM. 2014. Assessment of tolerance to bud rot in oil palm under field conditions. Eur J Plant Pathol 140: 711–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0491-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Niebel B, Freivalds A. 2004. Ingeniería industrial, métodos, estándares y diseño del trabajo. (Undécima edición ed.). Bogotá: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Rincón V, Molina A, Torres JL. 2018. Elaboración de formularios móviles digitales para el registro de datos en plantaciones de palma de aceite (Principios básicos). Bogotá: Cenipalma. [Google Scholar]
  • Rincón SM, Hormaza PA, Moreno LP, et al. 2013. Use of phenological stages of the fruits and physicochemical characteristics of the oil to determine the optimal harvest time of oil palm interspecific O × G hybrid fruits. Industrial Crops and Products 49: 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.04.035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Romero HM, Daza E, Ayala-Díaz I, Ruiz-Romero R. 2021. High-oleic palm oil (HOPO) production from parthenocarpic fruits in oil palm interspecific hybrids using naphthalene acetic acid. Agronomy 11(2): 290. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz-Álvarez E, Banguera J, Pérez Toro W, Hernández Hernández J, Arévalo J, Mosquera Montoya M. 2020. Technical and economic assessment of two harvesting tools for young Elaeis oleifera × E. guineensis oil palms. Agronomía Colombiana 38(3): 418–428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz-Álvarez E, Daza ES, Caballero-Blanco K, Mosquera-Montoya M. 2021. Complementing assisted pollination with artificial pollination in oil palm crops planted with interspecific hybrids O × G (Elaeis guineensis × Elaeis oleifera): is it profitable? OCL 28: 27. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez C, Fontanilla C, Mosquera M. 2010. Métodos para el desarrollo de estudios de tiempos y movimientos para labores del cultivo en palma de aceite. Bogotá (Colombia): Tecnologías para la agroindustria de la palma de aceite: Guía para facilitadores, 78 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanz JI, Mosquera M, Beltrán JA, Palm CO. 2018. Closing yield gaps for small-and medium-scale oil palm producers: improving cultivation practices Research Center-Cenipalma, Colombia. In: Achieving sustainable cultivation of oil palm, volume 2. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, pp. 403–426. [Google Scholar]
  • Swinburne TR. 1993. Fatal yellows bud rot and spear rot of African oil palm. A comparison of the symptoms of these diseases in Brazil, Ecuador and Columbia. Planter 69(802): 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Torres GA, Sarria GA, Martinez G, Varon F, Drenth A, Guest DI. 2016. Bud rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora: a destructive emerging disease of oil palm. Phytopathology 106: 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-15-0243-RVW. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.