EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 24 / No 6 (November-December 2017) OCL, 24 6 (2017) D602 References
Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2018050]

Issue
OCL
Volume 24, Number 6, November-December 2017
Article Number D602
Number of page(s) 10
Section Bees and Oil- and protein- crops / Abeilles et oléoprotéagineux
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017051
Published online 08 December 2017
  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Lopez PS, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF. 2000a. Reproductive biology of Wahlenbergia (Campanulaceae) endemic to Robinson Crusoe Island (Chile). Pl Syst Evol 223(1): 109–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Lopez P, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ. 2000b. Dioecy and wind pollination in Pernettya rigida (Ericaceae) of the Juan Fernández Islands. Bot J Linn Soc 132(2): 121–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ. 2001. Breeding system and pollination of selected plants endemic to Juan Fernández Islands. Amer J Bot 88(2): 220–233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Balakhnina TI. 2015. Plant responses to soil flooding. In: Tripathi BN, Müller M, eds. Stress responses in plants: mechanisms of toxicity and tolerance. Springer International Publishing, pp. 115–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Baude M, Kunin WE, Boatman ND, et al. 2016. Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain. Nature 30(7588): 85–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernardello G. 2007. A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 19–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernardello G, Galetto L, Anderson GJ. 2000. Floral nectary structure and nectar chemical composition of some species from Robinson Crusoe Island (Chile). Can J Bot 78(7): 862–871. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernardello G, Anderson GJ, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ. 2001. A survey of floral traits, breeding systems, floral visitors, and pollination systems of the angiosperms of the Juan Fernández Islands (Chile). Bot Rev 67(3): 255–308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berry J, Björkman O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Rev Pl Physiol 31(1): 491–543. [Google Scholar]
  • Bolker BM. 2008. Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Boose DL. 1997. Sources of variation in floral nectar production rate in Epilobium canum (Onagraceae): implications for natural selection. Oecologia 110(4): 493–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bosi G. 1973. Méthode rapide pour la détermination par chromatographie en phase gazeuse des glucides du nectar : technique de prélèvement du nectar et de préparation des éthers triméthylsilyles en présence d'eau. Apidologie 4(1): 57–64. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Branstetter MG, Danforth BN, Pitts JP, et al. 2017. Phylogenomic insights into the evolution of stinging wasps and the origins of ants and bees. Curr Biol 27(7): 1019–1025. [Google Scholar]
  • Búrquez A, Corbet SA. 1991. Do flowers reabsorb nectar? Funct Ecol 5(3): 369–379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cappellari SC, Schaefer H, Davis CC. 2013. Evolution: pollen or pollinators − Which came first? Curr Biol 23(8): R316–R318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carroll AB, Pallardy SG, Galen C. 2001. Drought stress, plant water status, and floral trait expression in fireweed, Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Amer J Bot 88(3): 438–446. [Google Scholar]
  • Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot (Oxford) 103(4): 551–560. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Corbet SA. 2003. Nectar sugar content: estimating standing crop and secretion rate in the field. Apidologie 34(1): 1–10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cruden RW, Hermann SM. 1983. Studying nectar? Some observations on the art. In: Bentley B, Elias T, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 223–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Cruden RW, Hermann SM, Peterson S. 1983. Patterns of nectar production and plant-pollinator coevolution. In: Bentley B, Elias T, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 223–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Dafni H, Lensky Y, Fahn A. 1988. Flower and nectar characteristics of nine species of Labiatae and their influence on honeybee visits. J Apic Res 27(2): 103–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis AR. 2001. Searching and breeding for structural features of flowers correlated with high nectar-carbohydrate production. Acta Hortic 561: 107–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis AR, Peterson RL, Shuel RW. 1986. Anatomy and vasculature of the floral nectaries of Brassica napus (Brassicaceae). Can J Bot 64 (11): 2508–2516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis AR, Pylatuik JD, Paradis JC, Low NH. 1998. Nectar-carbohydrate production and composition vary in relation to nectary anatomy and location within individual flowers of several species of Brassicaceae. Planta 205(2): 305–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Findlay N, Reed ML, Mercer FV. 1971. Nectar production in Abutilon III. Sugar secretion. Austral J Biol Sci 24(3): 665–675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR. 2011. History and evolution of pollination in angiosperms. In: Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. Cambridge University Press, pp. 415–443. [Google Scholar]
  • Galetto L, Bernardello G. 2004. Floral nectaries, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in six Ipomoea species (Convolvulaceae) in relation to pollinators. Ann Bot (Oxford) 94(2): 269–280. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gallagher MK, Campbell DR. 2017. Shifts in water availability mediate plant-pollinator interactions. New Phytol 215(2): 792–802. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Garibaldi LA, Requier F, Rollin O, Andersson GK. 2017. Towards an integrated species and habitat management of crop pollination. Curr Opin Insect Sci 21: 105–114. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gillespie S, Long R, Williams N. 2015. Indirect effects of field management on pollination service and seed set in hybrid onion seed production. J Econ Entomol 108(6): 2511–2517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huber H. 1956. Die Abhängigkeit der Nektarsekretion von Temperatur, Luft- und Bodenfeuchtigkeit. Planta 48(1): 47–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaczorowski RL, Juenger TE, Holtsford TP. 2008. Heritability and correlation structure of nectar and floral morphology traits in Nicotiana alata. Evolution 62(7): 1738–1750. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kamler F. 1984. Selection of lines of winter rape (Brassica napus v. arvensis) for nectar production. Ve Symposium International sur la Pollinisation. 27–30 Septembre 1983, Versailles. Les Colloques de l'Inra 21: 135–139. [Google Scholar]
  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirk WD, Ali M, Breadmore KN. 1995. The effects of pollen beetles on the foraging behaviour of honey bees. J Apic Res 34(1): 15–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krupnick GA, Weis AE, Campbell DR. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80(1): 125–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Langenberger MW, Davis AR. 2002. Temporal changes in floral nectar production, reabsorption, and composition associated with dichogamy in annual caraway (Carum carvi; Apiaceae). Amer J Bot 89(10): 1588–1598. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leiss KA, Klinkhamer PGL. 2005. Genotype by environment interactions in the nectar production of Echium vulgare. Funct Ecol 19(3): 454–459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindström SAM, Klatt BK, Smith HG, Bommarco R. 2017. Crop management affects pollinator attractiveness and visitation in oilseed rape. Basic Appl Ecol in press. [Google Scholar]
  • Luo EY, Ogilvie JE, Thomson JD. 2014. Stimulation of flower nectar replenishment by removal: a survey of eleven animal-pollinated plant species. J Pollinat Ecol 12(7): 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Mallick SA. 2000. Technique for washing nectar from the flowers of Tasmanian leatherwood (Eucryphia lucida Eucryphiaceae). Austral Ecol 25(2): 210–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mallinger RE, Prasifka JR. 2017. Bee visitation rates to cultivated sunflowers increase with the amount and accessibility of nectar sugars. J Appl Entomol 141(7): 561–573. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McKenna MA, Thomson JD. 1988. A technique for sampling and measuring small amounts of floral nectar. Ecology 69(4): 1306–1307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mesquida J, Marilleau R, Pham-Delègue MH, Renard M. 1988. A study of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera Metzger) flower nectar secretions. Apidologie 19(3): 307–318. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Mesquida J, Pham-Delègue MH, Marilleau R, Le Métayer M, Renard M. 1991. La sécrétion nectarifère des fleurs de cybrides mâles-stériles de colza d'hiver (Brassica napus L). Agronomie 11(3): 217–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michez D, Vanderplanck M, Engel MS. 2012. Fossil bees and their plant associates. In: Patiny S, ed. Evolution of plant-pollinator relationships. Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–164. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell RJ. 2004. Heritability of nectar traits: why do we know so little? Ecology 85(6): 1527–1533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morrant DS, Schumann R, Petit S. 2009. Field methods for sampling and storing nectar from flowers with low nectar volumes. Ann Bot 103(3): 533–542. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82(4): 591–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nepi M, Stpiczyńska M. 2008. The complexity of nectar: secretion and resorption dynamically regulate nectar features. Naturwissenschaften 95(3): 177–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolson SW. 1995. Direct demonstration of nectar reabsorption in the flowers of Grevillea robusta (Proteaceae). Funct Ecol 9(4): 584–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolson SW. 2007. Nectar consumers. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 289–342. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW. 2007. Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 215–264. [Google Scholar]
  • Pacini E, Nepi M. 2007. Nectar production and presentation. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 167–214. [Google Scholar]
  • Pacini E, Nepi M, Vesprini JL. 2003. Nectar biodiversity: a short review. Pl Syst Evol 238(1): 7–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelletier G, Budar F. 2015. Brassica Ogu-INRA cytoplasmic male sterility: an example of successful plant somatic fusion for hybrid seed production. In: Li X-Q, Donnelly DJ, Jensen TG, eds. Somatic genome manipulation: advances, methods and applications. New York: Springer, pp. 199–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Percival MS. 1961. Types of nectar in angiosperms. New Phytol 60(3): 235–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petanidou T. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 343–375. [Google Scholar]
  • Petanidou T, Goethals V, Smets E. 2000. Nectary structure of Labiatae in relation to their nectar secretion and characteristics in a Mediterranean shrub community − does flowering time matter? Pl Syst Evol 225(1): 103–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petanidou T, Smets E. 1996. Does temperature stress induce nectar secretion in Mediterranean plants? New Phytol 133(3): 513–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Petit S, Rubbo N, Schumann R. 2011. Nectar collected with microcapillary tubes is less concentrated than total nectar in flowers with small nectar volumes. Austral J Bot 59(6): 593–599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pierre J, Emeillat R. 2009. Les variétés de colza actuelles sont-elles peu nectarifères pour les abeilles ? Bull Tech Apic 36(1): 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Pierre J, Renard M. 2010. Bilan de 30 ans de travaux de recherche effectués en France sur la pollinisation du colza. OCL 17(3): 121–126. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Pierre J, Mesquida J, Marilleau R, Pham-Delègue MH, Renard M. 1999. Nectar secretion in winter oilseed rape, Brassica napus – quantitative and qualitative variability among 71 genotypes. Plant Breed 118(6): 471–476. [Google Scholar]
  • Poinar GO, Danforth BN. 2006. A fossil bee from Early Cretaceaous Burmese amber. Science 314(5799): 614. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Prŷs-Jones OE, Corbet SA. 2011. Bumblebees. Naturalists' handbooks 6, ecology and identification, 3rd ed. Pelagic publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Rogers HJ. 2006. Programmed cell death in floral organs: how and why do flowers die? Ann Bot 97(3): 309–315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sammataro D, Erickson EH, Garment MB. 1985. Ultrastructure of the sunflower nectary. J Apic Res 24(3): 150–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stead AD. 1992. Pollination-induced flower senescence: a review. Plant Growth Regul 11(1): 13–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Takhtajan AL. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot Rev 46(3): 225–359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Takkis K, Tscheulin T, Tsalkatis P, Petanidou T. 2015. Climate change reduces nectar secretion in two common Mediterranean plants. AoB Plants 7: plv111. [Google Scholar]
  • Teuber LR, Albertsen MC, Barnes DK, Heichel GH. 1980. Structure of floral nectaries of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in relation to nectar production. Amer J Bot 67(4): 433–439. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thom MD, Eberle CA, Forcella F, Gesch R, Weyers S, Lundgren JG. 2016. Nectar production in oilseeds: food for pollinators in an agricultural landscape. Crop Sci 56(2): 727–739. [Google Scholar]
  • Vaissière BE. 1991. Honey bees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), as pollinators of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (Malvaceae), for hybrid seed production. PhD, Texas A&M University. [Google Scholar]
  • van Doorn WG. 1997. Effects of pollination on floral attraction and longevity. J Exp Bot 48(9): 1615–1622. [Google Scholar]
  • Varga S, Nuortila C, Kytöviita M-M. 2013. Nectar sugar production across floral phases in the gynodioecious protandrous plant Geranium sylvaticum. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Villarreal AG, Freeman CE. 1990. Effects of temperature and water stress on some floral nectar characteristics in Ipomopsis longiflora (Polemoniaceae) under controlled conditions. Bot Gaz 151(1): 5–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waser NM, Price MV. 2016. Drought, pollen and nectar availability, and pollination success. Ecology 97(6): 1400–1409. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wist TJ, Davis AR. 2006. Floral nectar production and nectary anatomy and ultrastructure of Echinacea purpurea (Asteraceae). Ann Bot (Oxford) 97(2): 177–193. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wist TJ, Davis AR. 2008. Floral structure and dynamics of nectar production in Echinacea pallida var. angustifolia (Asteraceae). Int J Plant Sci 169(6): 708–722. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wyatt R, Broyles SB, Derda GS. 1992. Environmental influences on nectar production in milkweeds (Asclepias syriaca and A. exaltata). Amer J Bot 79(6): 636–642. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA. 2014. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res 119(1–2): 101–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.