Open Access
Volume 24, Number 6, November-December 2017
Article Number D602
Number of page(s) 10
Section Bees and Oil- and protein- crops / Abeilles et oléoprotéagineux
Published online 08 December 2017
  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Lopez PS, Crawford DJ, Stuessy TF. 2000a. Reproductive biology of Wahlenbergia (Campanulaceae) endemic to Robinson Crusoe Island (Chile). Pl Syst Evol 223(1): 109–123. [CrossRef]
  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Lopez P, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ. 2000b. Dioecy and wind pollination in Pernettya rigida (Ericaceae) of the Juan Fernández Islands. Bot J Linn Soc 132(2): 121–141. [CrossRef]
  • Anderson GJ, Bernardello G, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ. 2001. Breeding system and pollination of selected plants endemic to Juan Fernández Islands. Amer J Bot 88(2): 220–233. [CrossRef]
  • Balakhnina TI. 2015. Plant responses to soil flooding. In: Tripathi BN, Müller M, eds. Stress responses in plants: mechanisms of toxicity and tolerance. Springer International Publishing, pp. 115–142.
  • Baude M, Kunin WE, Boatman ND, et al. 2016. Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain. Nature 30(7588): 85–88. [CrossRef]
  • Bernardello G. 2007. A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 19–128.
  • Bernardello G, Galetto L, Anderson GJ. 2000. Floral nectary structure and nectar chemical composition of some species from Robinson Crusoe Island (Chile). Can J Bot 78(7): 862–871.
  • Bernardello G, Anderson GJ, Stuessy TF, Crawford DJ. 2001. A survey of floral traits, breeding systems, floral visitors, and pollination systems of the angiosperms of the Juan Fernández Islands (Chile). Bot Rev 67(3): 255–308. [CrossRef]
  • Berry J, Björkman O. 1980. Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annual Rev Pl Physiol 31(1): 491–543. [CrossRef]
  • Bolker BM. 2008. Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press.
  • Boose DL. 1997. Sources of variation in floral nectar production rate in Epilobium canum (Onagraceae): implications for natural selection. Oecologia 110(4): 493–500. [CrossRef]
  • Bosi G. 1973. Méthode rapide pour la détermination par chromatographie en phase gazeuse des glucides du nectar : technique de prélèvement du nectar et de préparation des éthers triméthylsilyles en présence d'eau. Apidologie 4(1): 57–64. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Branstetter MG, Danforth BN, Pitts JP, et al. 2017. Phylogenomic insights into the evolution of stinging wasps and the origins of ants and bees. Curr Biol 27(7): 1019–1025. [CrossRef]
  • Búrquez A, Corbet SA. 1991. Do flowers reabsorb nectar? Funct Ecol 5(3): 369–379. [CrossRef]
  • Cappellari SC, Schaefer H, Davis CC. 2013. Evolution: pollen or pollinators − Which came first? Curr Biol 23(8): R316–R318. [CrossRef]
  • Carroll AB, Pallardy SG, Galen C. 2001. Drought stress, plant water status, and floral trait expression in fireweed, Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Amer J Bot 88(3): 438–446. [CrossRef]
  • Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. 2009. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot (Oxford) 103(4): 551–560. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Corbet SA. 2003. Nectar sugar content: estimating standing crop and secretion rate in the field. Apidologie 34(1): 1–10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Cruden RW, Hermann SM. 1983. Studying nectar? Some observations on the art. In: Bentley B, Elias T, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 223–241.
  • Cruden RW, Hermann SM, Peterson S. 1983. Patterns of nectar production and plant-pollinator coevolution. In: Bentley B, Elias T, eds. The biology of nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 223–241.
  • Dafni H, Lensky Y, Fahn A. 1988. Flower and nectar characteristics of nine species of Labiatae and their influence on honeybee visits. J Apic Res 27(2): 103–114. [CrossRef]
  • Davis AR. 2001. Searching and breeding for structural features of flowers correlated with high nectar-carbohydrate production. Acta Hortic 561: 107–121. [CrossRef]
  • Davis AR, Peterson RL, Shuel RW. 1986. Anatomy and vasculature of the floral nectaries of Brassica napus (Brassicaceae). Can J Bot 64 (11): 2508–2516. [CrossRef]
  • Davis AR, Pylatuik JD, Paradis JC, Low NH. 1998. Nectar-carbohydrate production and composition vary in relation to nectary anatomy and location within individual flowers of several species of Brassicaceae. Planta 205(2): 305–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Findlay N, Reed ML, Mercer FV. 1971. Nectar production in Abutilon III. Sugar secretion. Austral J Biol Sci 24(3): 665–675. [CrossRef]
  • Friis EM, Crane PR, Pedersen KR. 2011. History and evolution of pollination in angiosperms. In: Early flowers and angiosperm evolution. Cambridge University Press, pp. 415–443.
  • Galetto L, Bernardello G. 2004. Floral nectaries, nectar production dynamics and chemical composition in six Ipomoea species (Convolvulaceae) in relation to pollinators. Ann Bot (Oxford) 94(2): 269–280. [CrossRef]
  • Gallagher MK, Campbell DR. 2017. Shifts in water availability mediate plant-pollinator interactions. New Phytol 215(2): 792–802. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Garibaldi LA, Requier F, Rollin O, Andersson GK. 2017. Towards an integrated species and habitat management of crop pollination. Curr Opin Insect Sci 21: 105–114. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Gillespie S, Long R, Williams N. 2015. Indirect effects of field management on pollination service and seed set in hybrid onion seed production. J Econ Entomol 108(6): 2511–2517. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Huber H. 1956. Die Abhängigkeit der Nektarsekretion von Temperatur, Luft- und Bodenfeuchtigkeit. Planta 48(1): 47–98. [CrossRef]
  • Kaczorowski RL, Juenger TE, Holtsford TP. 2008. Heritability and correlation structure of nectar and floral morphology traits in Nicotiana alata. Evolution 62(7): 1738–1750. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Kamler F. 1984. Selection of lines of winter rape (Brassica napus v. arvensis) for nectar production. Ve Symposium International sur la Pollinisation. 27–30 Septembre 1983, Versailles. Les Colloques de l'Inra 21: 135–139.
  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado.
  • Kirk WD, Ali M, Breadmore KN. 1995. The effects of pollen beetles on the foraging behaviour of honey bees. J Apic Res 34(1): 15–22. [CrossRef]
  • Krupnick GA, Weis AE, Campbell DR. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80(1): 125–134. [CrossRef]
  • Langenberger MW, Davis AR. 2002. Temporal changes in floral nectar production, reabsorption, and composition associated with dichogamy in annual caraway (Carum carvi; Apiaceae). Amer J Bot 89(10): 1588–1598. [CrossRef]
  • Leiss KA, Klinkhamer PGL. 2005. Genotype by environment interactions in the nectar production of Echium vulgare. Funct Ecol 19(3): 454–459. [CrossRef]
  • Lindström SAM, Klatt BK, Smith HG, Bommarco R. 2017. Crop management affects pollinator attractiveness and visitation in oilseed rape. Basic Appl Ecol in press.
  • Luo EY, Ogilvie JE, Thomson JD. 2014. Stimulation of flower nectar replenishment by removal: a survey of eleven animal-pollinated plant species. J Pollinat Ecol 12(7): 52–62.
  • Mallick SA. 2000. Technique for washing nectar from the flowers of Tasmanian leatherwood (Eucryphia lucida Eucryphiaceae). Austral Ecol 25(2): 210–212. [CrossRef]
  • Mallinger RE, Prasifka JR. 2017. Bee visitation rates to cultivated sunflowers increase with the amount and accessibility of nectar sugars. J Appl Entomol 141(7): 561–573. [CrossRef]
  • McKenna MA, Thomson JD. 1988. A technique for sampling and measuring small amounts of floral nectar. Ecology 69(4): 1306–1307. [CrossRef]
  • Mesquida J, Marilleau R, Pham-Delègue MH, Renard M. 1988. A study of rapeseed (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera Metzger) flower nectar secretions. Apidologie 19(3): 307–318. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Mesquida J, Pham-Delègue MH, Marilleau R, Le Métayer M, Renard M. 1991. La sécrétion nectarifère des fleurs de cybrides mâles-stériles de colza d'hiver (Brassica napus L). Agronomie 11(3): 217–227. [CrossRef]
  • Michez D, Vanderplanck M, Engel MS. 2012. Fossil bees and their plant associates. In: Patiny S, ed. Evolution of plant-pollinator relationships. Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–164.
  • Mitchell RJ. 2004. Heritability of nectar traits: why do we know so little? Ecology 85(6): 1527–1533. [CrossRef]
  • Morrant DS, Schumann R, Petit S. 2009. Field methods for sampling and storing nectar from flowers with low nectar volumes. Ann Bot 103(3): 533–542. [CrossRef]
  • Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. 2007. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev 82(4): 591–605. [CrossRef]
  • Nepi M, Stpiczyńska M. 2008. The complexity of nectar: secretion and resorption dynamically regulate nectar features. Naturwissenschaften 95(3): 177–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Nicolson SW. 1995. Direct demonstration of nectar reabsorption in the flowers of Grevillea robusta (Proteaceae). Funct Ecol 9(4): 584–588. [CrossRef]
  • Nicolson SW. 2007. Nectar consumers. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 289–342.
  • Nicolson SW, Thornburg RW. 2007. Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 215–264.
  • Pacini E, Nepi M. 2007. Nectar production and presentation. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 167–214.
  • Pacini E, Nepi M, Vesprini JL. 2003. Nectar biodiversity: a short review. Pl Syst Evol 238(1): 7–21. [CrossRef]
  • Pelletier G, Budar F. 2015. Brassica Ogu-INRA cytoplasmic male sterility: an example of successful plant somatic fusion for hybrid seed production. In: Li X-Q, Donnelly DJ, Jensen TG, eds. Somatic genome manipulation: advances, methods and applications. New York: Springer, pp. 199–216.
  • Percival MS. 1961. Types of nectar in angiosperms. New Phytol 60(3): 235–281. [CrossRef]
  • Petanidou T. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of floral nectars in Mediterranean habitats. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and nectar. Springer, pp. 343–375.
  • Petanidou T, Goethals V, Smets E. 2000. Nectary structure of Labiatae in relation to their nectar secretion and characteristics in a Mediterranean shrub community − does flowering time matter? Pl Syst Evol 225(1): 103–118. [CrossRef]
  • Petanidou T, Smets E. 1996. Does temperature stress induce nectar secretion in Mediterranean plants? New Phytol 133(3): 513–518. [CrossRef]
  • Petit S, Rubbo N, Schumann R. 2011. Nectar collected with microcapillary tubes is less concentrated than total nectar in flowers with small nectar volumes. Austral J Bot 59(6): 593–599. [CrossRef]
  • Pierre J, Emeillat R. 2009. Les variétés de colza actuelles sont-elles peu nectarifères pour les abeilles ? Bull Tech Apic 36(1): 17–24.
  • Pierre J, Renard M. 2010. Bilan de 30 ans de travaux de recherche effectués en France sur la pollinisation du colza. OCL 17(3): 121–126. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Pierre J, Mesquida J, Marilleau R, Pham-Delègue MH, Renard M. 1999. Nectar secretion in winter oilseed rape, Brassica napus – quantitative and qualitative variability among 71 genotypes. Plant Breed 118(6): 471–476.
  • Poinar GO, Danforth BN. 2006. A fossil bee from Early Cretaceaous Burmese amber. Science 314(5799): 614. [CrossRef]
  • Prŷs-Jones OE, Corbet SA. 2011. Bumblebees. Naturalists' handbooks 6, ecology and identification, 3rd ed. Pelagic publishing.
  • R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL
  • Rogers HJ. 2006. Programmed cell death in floral organs: how and why do flowers die? Ann Bot 97(3): 309–315. [CrossRef]
  • Sammataro D, Erickson EH, Garment MB. 1985. Ultrastructure of the sunflower nectary. J Apic Res 24(3): 150–160. [CrossRef]
  • Stead AD. 1992. Pollination-induced flower senescence: a review. Plant Growth Regul 11(1): 13–20. [CrossRef]
  • Takhtajan AL. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot Rev 46(3): 225–359. [CrossRef]
  • Takkis K, Tscheulin T, Tsalkatis P, Petanidou T. 2015. Climate change reduces nectar secretion in two common Mediterranean plants. AoB Plants 7: plv111.
  • Teuber LR, Albertsen MC, Barnes DK, Heichel GH. 1980. Structure of floral nectaries of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in relation to nectar production. Amer J Bot 67(4): 433–439. [CrossRef]
  • Thom MD, Eberle CA, Forcella F, Gesch R, Weyers S, Lundgren JG. 2016. Nectar production in oilseeds: food for pollinators in an agricultural landscape. Crop Sci 56(2): 727–739.
  • Vaissière BE. 1991. Honey bees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), as pollinators of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. (Malvaceae), for hybrid seed production. PhD, Texas A&M University.
  • van Doorn WG. 1997. Effects of pollination on floral attraction and longevity. J Exp Bot 48(9): 1615–1622.
  • Varga S, Nuortila C, Kytöviita M-M. 2013. Nectar sugar production across floral phases in the gynodioecious protandrous plant Geranium sylvaticum. PLoS ONE 8(4): e62575. [CrossRef]
  • Villarreal AG, Freeman CE. 1990. Effects of temperature and water stress on some floral nectar characteristics in Ipomopsis longiflora (Polemoniaceae) under controlled conditions. Bot Gaz 151(1): 5–9. [CrossRef]
  • Waser NM, Price MV. 2016. Drought, pollen and nectar availability, and pollination success. Ecology 97(6): 1400–1409. [CrossRef]
  • Wist TJ, Davis AR. 2006. Floral nectar production and nectary anatomy and ultrastructure of Echinacea purpurea (Asteraceae). Ann Bot (Oxford) 97(2): 177–193. [CrossRef]
  • Wist TJ, Davis AR. 2008. Floral structure and dynamics of nectar production in Echinacea pallida var. angustifolia (Asteraceae). Int J Plant Sci 169(6): 708–722. [CrossRef]
  • Wyatt R, Broyles SB, Derda GS. 1992. Environmental influences on nectar production in milkweeds (Asclepias syriaca and A. exaltata). Amer J Bot 79(6): 636–642. [CrossRef]
  • Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA. 2014. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res 119(1–2): 101–117. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.