Open Access
Volume 18, Number 3, Mai-Juin 2011
Dossier : Biodiversité et cultures végétales (approches)
Page(s) 132 - 136
Section Introduction
Published online 15 May 2011
  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD. Farmland biodiversity : is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2003 ; 18 : 182–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, et al. Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes : a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 2008 ; 45 : 141–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bohan DA, Boursault A, Brooks DR, Petit S. National-scale regulation of the weed seedbank by carabid predators. J Appl Ecol 2011 ;. Doi : 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02008.x. [Google Scholar]
  • Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RGH, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M. 2000, Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J App Ecol 2000 ; 37 : 771–788. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chevassus-au-Louis B, Griffon M. La nouvelle modernité : une agriculture productive à haute valeur écologique. In Economie et stratégies agricoles. Paris: Edition Club Déméter 2008, 7–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Cordell D, Schmidt-Neset T, White S, Drangert JO. The Story of Phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. In: Ashley K, Mavinic D, Koch F (Eds.), Global Environmental Change, International Conference on Nutrient Recovery. Corwall, UK: IWA Publishing, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Donald DB, Green RE, Heath MF. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2001 ; 268 : 25–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Even MA, Laisney C. 2011. La demande alimentaire en 2050 : chiffres, incertitudes et marges de manœuvre. Service de la statistique et de la prospective. Centre d’Etudes et de Prospective. Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du Territoire. [Google Scholar]
  • Diaz RJ, Rosenberg R. Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems. Science 2008 ; 321 : 926–929. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Filippi-Codaccioni O, Devictor V, Bas Y, Clobert J, Julliard R. Specialist response to proportion of arable land and pesticide input in agricultural landscapes. Biological Conservation 2010 ; 143 : 883–890. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A. Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature. Science 2005 ; 307 : 550–555. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnsen K, Jacobsen C, Torsvik V, Sørensen J. Pesticide effects on bacterial diversity in agricultural soils - a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2001 ; 33 : 443–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klein AM, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2007 ; 274 : 303–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kloepper JW, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Zehnder GW, Murphy JF, Sikora E, Fernandez C. Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology 1999 ; 28 : 21–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lupwayi NZ, Rice WA, Clayton GW. Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 1998 ; 30 : 1733–1741. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA. Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Morse RA, Calderone NW. The value of honey bees as pollinators of U.S. crops in, 2000. Bee Culture 2000 ; 128 : 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proença V, et al. Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century. Science 2010 ; 330 : 1496–1501. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GRd, Eden P. Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manage 2001 ; 63 : 337–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D, Reich PB, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C. Diversity and productivity in a longterm grassland experiment. Science 2001 ; 294 : 843–845. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002 ; 418 : 671–677. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 2005 ; 8 : 857–874. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tscharntke T, Bommarco R, Clough Y, et al. Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biological control 2007 ; 43 : 294–309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Winfree R, Williams NM, Dushoff J, Kremen C. Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecology Letters 2007: 10 ; 1105–1113. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu Y, Chen H, Fan J, et al. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature 2000 ; 406 : 718–722. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.