Table 6

Benefit/cost ratio of different production systems intercropped with young oil palm.

Production system Data referred to1 Ratio B/ C Time lapse2 Source
Corn (Zea mays) IC 2,86 I Manorama et al. (2019)
IC 1,43 HC Koussihouèdé et al. (2020)
IC 1,76 Y Agustira et al. (2018)
Soy (Glicine max) IC 1.51 Y Agustira et al. (2018)
Cassava (Manihot esculenta) IC 1,70 HC Koussihouèdé et al. (2020)
Pineapple (Ananas comosus) IC 2,14 HC Koussihouèdé et al. (2020)
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) IC 4,18 HC Koussihouèdé et al. (2020)
Okra (Abelmochus esculenta) IC 1,33 I Manorama et al. (2019)
Onion (Allium cepa) IC 0,26 Y Reddi et al. (2015)
Chili (Capsicum annuum) IC 1,78 I Manorama et al. (2019)
Heliconias (Heliconia spp.) P + IC 2,80 Y Ramachandrudu et al. (2014)
P + IC 2,38 I Manorama et al. (2019)
Cowpea bean (Vigna unguiculata) IC 1,28 HC Adri and Yardha, (2022)
1

IC= values only for intercropped crop; P = values only for oil palm crop; P + IC = values considering palm + intercropping

2

HC =values per harvest cycle; Y = values per year; I =values for the duration of intercropping.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.