Open Access
Issue
OCL
Volume 25, Number 5, September-October 2018
Article Number D502
Number of page(s) 10
Section Lipids and cosmetics / Lipides et cosmétiques
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2018053
Published online 28 September 2018
  • Abidh S. 2017. Méthodologie d’ingénierie sensorielle pour la formulation de produits cosmétiques, application au rouge à lèvres. Thèse de Doctorat NNT: 2017SACLA023. [Google Scholar]
  • Abidh S, Cuvelier G, de Clermont-Gallerande H, Navarro S, Delarue J. 2016. Sensory-designed lipsticks: from sensory needs to raw materials selection, a new way of formulation, Proceeding of the 29th IFSCC Congress, 31st Oct.–2nd Nov. 2016, Orlando, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • AFNOR. 1990. Analyse sensorielle – recherche et sélection de descripteurs pour l’élaboration d’un profil sensoriel, par approche multidimensionnelle. NF V09-021 mai 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • Cansell M, Talence FF. 2005. Impact de la cristallisation des corps gras sur les propriétés des produits finis. OCL 12: 427–443. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • de Carames, M. 1978. Development of a lipstick base. Cosmet Toil 93: 15. [Google Scholar]
  • de Clermont-Gallerande H. 2006. Évolution des corps gras utilisés dans la formulation des rouges à lèvres au cours des 15 dernières années. OCL 13: 322–325. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Desmet P, Hekkert P. 2007. Framework of Product Experience. Int J Des 1(1): 13–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Dooley LM, Adhikari K, Chambers IV.E. 2009. A general lexicon for sensory analysis of texture and appearance of lip products. J Sens Stud 24(4): 581–600. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drew RC. 1978. Evaluation of mechanical stresses set up in lipsticks during application. J SOC Cosmet Chem 29: 441. [Google Scholar]
  • Hill SE, Rodeheffer CD, Griskevicius V, Durante K, White AE. 2012. Boosting beauty in an economic decline: mating, spending, and the lipstick effect. J Personal Soc Psychol 103(2): 275–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez A, Allison M. 2010. Beauty-products sales bright spot during recession. The Seattle Times, 09th September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Meilgaard MC, Civille GV, Carr BT. 2006. Sensory evaluation techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson E. 2001. Rising lipstick sales may mean pouting economy and few smiles. The Wall Street Journal, 26th November 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • Oglivie M, Kristensen-Bach P. 2015. Why women wear lispticks: preliminary findings. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49282703_Why_women_wear_lipstick_preliminary_findings. (last consult 2018/02/02). [Google Scholar]
  • Pensé-Lhéritier AM. 2015. Recent developments in the sensorial assessment of cosmetic products: A review. Int J Cosmetic Sci 37(5): 465–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Russell R, Porcheron A, Sweda JR, Jones AL, Mauger E, Morizot F. 2016. Facial contrast is a cue for perceiving health from the face. J Exp Psychol: Human Percept Perform 42(9): 1354–1362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Savary G, Grisel M, Picard C. 2013. Impact of emollients on the spreading properties of cosmetic products: a combined sensory and instrumental characterization. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 102: 371–378. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schaefer K. 2008. Hard times, but your lips look great. The New York Times, 01st May 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Snabre P, Habouzit D. 2013. Chauffage, endommagement et exsudation des matériaux semi-cristallins à base de corps gras. I-Revues, 21e Congrés Français de Mécanique [CFM2013], Colloques thématiques, C10 – Rencontres physique/mécanique. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.