Open Access
Volume 17, Number 1, Janvier-Février 2010
Dossier : Comment peut-on améliorer la qualité nutritionnelle des graisses animales ?
Page(s) 1 - 5
Section Environnement
Published online 15 January 2010
  • Benbrook C. Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in the United States: the first nine years. Technical Paper n° 7, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Benbrook C. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use: The first thirteen years. The Organic Center, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Brookes G, Barfoot P. Global impact of Biotech crops: socio-economics and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. J Agrobiotech Managt Eco 2006; 9: [Google Scholar]
  • Brookes G, Barfoot P. GM crops global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996-2007. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruck D, Lopez MD, Lewis LC, Prasifka JR, Gunnarson RD. Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corm and permethrin on nontarget arthropods. J Agric Urban Entomol 2006; 23: 111–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Cloutier C, Boudreault S, Michaud D. Impact de pommes de terre résistantes au doryphore sur les arthropods non vises : une méta-analyse des facteurs possiblement en cause dans l’échec d’une plante transgénique Bt. C ah Agric 2008; 17: 388–394. [Google Scholar]
  • Darmency H., De Prado R, Jorrin R, Garcia-Torres L, eds. Gene flow between crops and weeds: risk for new herbicide resistant weeds? ln : Weed and crop resistance to herbicides. 1997, Dordrecht (Netherland): Kluwer Acad. Pub, 239–248. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Darmency H., Lelley T, Balazs E, Tepfer M eds. Transgenic herbicide-resistant crops : what makes the difference ? ln : Ecological impact of GMO dissemination in Agro-Ecosystems. Grossrussbach (Autriche): OECD 2002, 77–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez-Cornejo J, Nehring R, Newcomb Sinha E, Grube A, Vialou A. Assessing Recent Trends in Pesticide Use in US. Agriculture. Selected Paper Presented at the 2009 Meetings of the AAEA, Milwaukee, Wisconsin July 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Gomez-Barbero M, Berbel J, Rodriguez-Cerezo E. Bt corn in Spain: the performance of the EU’s first GM crop. Nature Biotech 2008; 26: 384–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heap I. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C. Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 2005; 308: 688–690. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2008, Brief 39. [Google Scholar]
  • Lövei GL, Arpaia S. The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies. Entomo Exp Appli 2005; 114: 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Messéan A, Sausse C, Gasquez J, Darmency H. Occurrence of genetically modified oilseed rape seeds in the harvest of subsequent conventional oilseed rape over time. Eur J Agro 2007; 27: 115–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosi-Marshall EJ, Tank JL, Royer TV, et al. Toxins in transgenic crop byproducts may affect head water stream ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007; 104: 16204–16208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roush RT. Two-toxin strategies for management of insectidial transgenic crops: can pyramiding succeed where pesticide mixture have not? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 1998; 353: 1777–1786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sankula S Quantification of the impacts on US agriculture of biotechnology-derived crops planted in 2005. 2006: [Google Scholar]
  • Tabashnik BE, Gassmann AJ, Crowder DW, Carrière Y. Insect resistance to Bt crops: evidence versus theory. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 199–202. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Warwick SI, Légère A, Simard MJ, James T. Do escaped transgenes persist in nature? The case of an herbicide resistance transgene in a weedy Brassica rapa population. Mol Ecol 2008; 17: 1387–1395. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.